The Meta-Science of Adult Statistical Word Segmentation: Part 1

We report the first set of results in a multi-year project to assess the robustness – and the factors promoting robustness – of the adult statistical word segmentation literature. This includes eight total experiments replicating six different experiments. The purpose of these replications is to ass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCollabra. Psychology Vol. 5; no. 1
Main Authors Hartshorne, Joshua K., Skorb, Lauren, Dietz, Sven L., Garcia, Caitlin R., Iozzo, Gina L., Lamirato, Katie E., Ledoux, James R., Mu, Jesse, Murdock, Kara N., Ravid, Jon, Savery, Alyssa A., Spizzirro, James E., Trimm, Kelsey A., van Horne, Kendall D., Vidal, Juliani
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oakland University of California Press 2019
University of California Press, Journals & Digital Publishing Division
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2474-7394
2474-7394
DOI10.1525/collabra.181

Cover

More Information
Summary:We report the first set of results in a multi-year project to assess the robustness – and the factors promoting robustness – of the adult statistical word segmentation literature. This includes eight total experiments replicating six different experiments. The purpose of these replications is to assess the reproducibility of reported experiments, examine the replicability of their results, and provide more accurate effect size estimates. Reproducibility was mixed, with several papers either lacking crucial details or containing errors in the description of method, making it difficult to ascertain what was done. Replicability was also mixed: although in every instance we confirmed above-chance statistical word segmentation, many theoretically important moderations of that learning failed to replicate. Moreover, learning success was generally much lower than in the original studies. In the General Discussion, we consider whether these differences are due to differences in subject populations, low power in the original studies, or some combination of these and other factors. We also consider whether these findings are likely to generalize to the broader statistical word segmentation literature.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2474-7394
2474-7394
DOI:10.1525/collabra.181