Comparative analysis of click chemistry mediated activity-based protein profiling in cell lysates
Activity-based protein profiling uses chemical probes that covalently attach to active enzyme targets. Probes with conventional tags have disadvantages, such as limited cell permeability or steric hindrance around the reactive group. A tandem labeling strategy with click chemistry is now widely used...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 18; no. 10; pp. 12599 - 12608 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
11.10.2013
MDPI |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Activity-based protein profiling uses chemical probes that covalently attach to active enzyme targets. Probes with conventional tags have disadvantages, such as limited cell permeability or steric hindrance around the reactive group. A tandem labeling strategy with click chemistry is now widely used to study enzyme targets in situ and in vivo. Herein, the probes are reacted in live cells, whereas the ensuing detection by click chemistry takes place in cell lysates. We here make a comparison of the efficiency of the activity-based tandem labeling strategy by using Cu(I)-catalyzed and strain-promoted click chemistry, different ligands and different lysis conditions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1420-3049 1420-3049 |
DOI: | 10.3390/molecules181012599 |