Removal of benzene, MTBE and toluene from contaminated waters using biochar-based liquid activated carbon

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 19651 - 11
• Main Authors: Alshahrani, F, Tawabini, B, Saleh, T, Alrayaan, M, Alaama, S, Nasser, R, Soupios, P, Kirmizakis, P, Mahmoud, M, Oyehan, T, Safi, E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Nature Publishing Group 16.11.2022; Nature Publishing Group UK; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: Activated carbon; Adsorbents; Adsorption; Benzene; Calcium Carbonate; Carbon; Charcoal; Contaminants; Efficiency; Environmental Pollutants; Groundwater; Hydrocarbons; Iron; Iron - chemistry; Limestone; MTBE; Pollutant removal; Pollutants; Pollution detection; Remediation; Sand; Toluene; Water chemistry; Water resources
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24283-6

Fuel components such as benzene, toluene, and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) are frequently detected pollutants in groundwater resources. Ex-situ remediation technologies by activated carbon have been used for treatment for many years. However, due to high cost of these technology, more attention has been given to the in-situ remediation methods of contaminated groundwaters using liquid carbon adsorbents. Literature search showed limited studies on using adsorbents in liquid form for the removal of such contaminants. Therefore, this lab-scale study investigates the capacity of using raw biochar-based liquid activated carbon and iron-modified biochar-based liquid activated carbon to remove these pollutants. The adsorption efficiency of the synthesized liquid activated carbon and iron-modified liquid activated carbon mixed with sand, limestone, and 1:1 mixture of sand/limestone, was tested using batch suspension experiments. Adsorption by granular activated carbon was also investigated for comparison with liquid activated carbon. Results of the study revealed that mixing of liquid activated carbon or LAC-Fe on subsurface materials had not improved the removal efficiency of MTBE. At the same time, it showed a slight improvement in the adsorption efficiency of benzene and toluene. In all cases, the removal by GAC was higher with around 80% and 90% for MTBE and BT, respectively. Results also showed that benzene and toluene were better removed by liquid activated carbon and iron-modified liquid activated carbon (∼ 40%) than MTBE (∼ 20%). It is also found that water chemistry (i.e., salinity and pH) had insignificant effects on the removal efficiency of pollutants under the study conditions. It can be concluded that more research is needed to improve the capacity of biochar-based liquid-activated carbon in removing MTBE, benzene and toluene compounds that will lead to improve the utilization of liquid activated carbon for the in-situ remediation of contaminated groundwaters.