Velocity-based resistance training: impact of velocity loss in the set on neuromuscular performance and hormonal response

• Published in: Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism Vol. 45; no. 8; pp. 817 - 828
• Main Authors: Rodríguez-Rosell, David, Yáñez-García, Juan Manuel, Mora-Custodio, Ricardo, Pareja-Blanco, Fernando, Ravelo-García, Antonio G, Ribas-Serna, Juan, González-Badillo, Juan José
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 1840 Woodward Drive, Suite 1, Ottawa, ON K2C 0P7 NRC Research Press 01.08.2020; Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press
• Subjects: accroupissement complet; adaptations musculaires; electromyography; EMG; endocrine response; Endurance; entraînement en résistance; force musculaire; full squat; Hormones; males; metabolism; muscle adaptations; muscle strength; muscles; Muscular system; Neurology; nutrition; performance physique; physical performance; resistance training; Running; réponse endocrinienne; Strength training; Velocity; Weight training; Spain
• ISSN: 1715-5312; 1715-5320; 1715-5320
• DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2019-0829

This study aimed to compare the effects of 2 resistance training (RT) programs with different velocity losses (VLs) allowed in each set: 10% (VL10%) versus 30% (VL30%) on neuromuscular performance and hormonal response. Twenty-five young healthy males were randomly assigned into 2 groups: VL10% (n = 12) or VL30% (n = 13). Subjects followed a velocity-based RT program for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week) using only the full-squat (SQ) exercise at 70%–85% 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Repetition velocity was recorded in all training sessions. A 20-m running sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ), 1RM, muscle endurance, and electromyogram (EMG) during SQ exercise and resting hormonal concentrations were assessed before and after the RT program. Both groups showed similar improvements in muscle strength and endurance variables (VL10%: 7.0%–74.8%; VL30%: 4.2%–73.2%). The VL10% resulted in greater percentage increments in CMJ (9.2% vs. 5.4%) and sprint performance (–1.5% vs. 0.4%) than VL30%, despite VL10% performing less than half of the repetitions than VL30% during RT. In addition, only VL10% showed slight increments in EMG variables, whereas no significant changes in resting hormonal concentrations were observed. Therefore, our results suggest that velocity losses in the set as low as 10% are enough to achieve significant improvements in neuromuscular performance, which means greater efficiency during RT. Novelty The VL10% group showed similar or even greater percentage of changes in physical performance compared with VL30%. No significant changes in resting hormonal concentrations were observed for any training group. Curvilinear relationships between percentage VL in the set and changes in strength and CMJ performance were observed.