Transcranial Doppler Studies on Cerebral Autoregulation Suggest Prolonged Cerebral Vasoconstriction in a Subgroup of Patients with Orthostatic Intolerance

Abstract We studied the cerebral autoregulation in a subgroup of patients with orthostatic intolerance, who exhibited excessively decreased middle cerebral artery flow velocity (MCAFV) on transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) during head-up tilt (HUT) test but without orthostatic hypotension or post...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUltrasound in medicine & biology Vol. 37; no. 10; pp. 1554 - 1560
Main Authors Lin, Ya-Ju, Po, Helen L, Hsu, Hung-Yi, Chung, Chih-Ping, Sheng, Wen-Yung, Hu, Han-Hwa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.10.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract We studied the cerebral autoregulation in a subgroup of patients with orthostatic intolerance, who exhibited excessively decreased middle cerebral artery flow velocity (MCAFV) on transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) during head-up tilt (HUT) test but without orthostatic hypotension or postural tachycardia. Twenty patients and 20 age- and sex-matched controls underwent Valsalva maneuver (VM) and HUT test with simultaneous monitoring of MCAFV by TCD and blood pressure, heart rate recordings. The pulsatility index (PI), cerebrovascular resistance (CVR) and autoregulatory indices were calculated. During HUT, patients had marked MCAFV reduction (−29.0 ± 5.25% vs. −8.01 ± 4.37%), paradoxically decreased PI (0.68 ± 0.17 vs. 0.96 ± 0.28) but increased CVR (45.7 ± 16.7% vs. 14.3 ± 12.6%). The MCAFV decreased similarly during early phase II of VM in both groups but did not recover to baseline in patients during late phase II, phase III and less overshoot in phase IV (−11 ± 16.7% vs. +2.2 ± 17.9 %; −15.4 ± 16.5% vs. −2.4 ± 17.8% and 16.7 ± 22.9% vs. 38.7 ± 26.5%, respectively). We concluded that in these patients, cerebrovascular vasoconstriction in response to physiologic stimulation was normal but relaxation during and after stimulation were impaired, indicating prolonged cerebral vasoconstriction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0301-5629
1879-291X
DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.06.008