A Comparative Analysis of the Addition and Subtraction of Fractions in Textbooks from Three Countries

In this paper, we report on a comparison of the treatment of addition and subtraction of fractions in primary mathematics textbooks used in Cyprus, Ireland, and Taiwan. To this end, we use a framework specifically developed to investigate the learning opportunities afforded by the textbooks, particu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMathematical thinking and learning Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 117 - 151
Main Authors Charalambous, Charalambos Y., Delaney, Seán, Hsu, Hui-Yu, Mesa, Vilma
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Taylor & Francis Group 01.04.2010
Routledge
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1098-6065
1532-7833
DOI10.1080/10986060903460070

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, we report on a comparison of the treatment of addition and subtraction of fractions in primary mathematics textbooks used in Cyprus, Ireland, and Taiwan. To this end, we use a framework specifically developed to investigate the learning opportunities afforded by the textbooks, particularly with respect to the presentation of the content and the textbook expectations as manifested in the associated tasks. We found several similarities and differences among the textbooks regarding the topics included and their sequencing, the constructs of fractions, the worked examples, the cognitive demands of the tasks, and the types of responses required of students. The findings emphasized the need to examine textbooks in order to understand differences in instruction and achievement across countries. Indeed, we postulate that within a given country there may exist a recognizable "textbook signature." We also draw on the results and the challenges inherent in our analysis to provide suggestions and directions for future textbook analysis studies.
Bibliography:Refereed article. Includes bibliographical references.
Mathematical Thinking and Learning; v.12 n.2 p.117-151; April-June 2010
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:1098-6065
1532-7833
DOI:10.1080/10986060903460070