Clathrin domains involved in recognition by assembly protein AP-2

The domains on clathrin responsible for interaction with the plasma membrane-associated assembly protein AP-2 have been studied using a novel cage binding assay. AP-2 bound to pure clathrin cages but not to coat structures already containing AP that had been prepared by coassembly. Binding to preass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 266; no. 12; pp. 7950 - 7956
Main Authors Keen, J H, Beck, K A, Kirchhausen, T, Jarrett, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bethesda, MD Elsevier Inc 25.04.1991
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The domains on clathrin responsible for interaction with the plasma membrane-associated assembly protein AP-2 have been studied using a novel cage binding assay. AP-2 bound to pure clathrin cages but not to coat structures already containing AP that had been prepared by coassembly. Binding to preassembled cages also occurred in the presence of elevated Tris-HCl concentrations (greater than or equal to 200 mM) which block AP-2 interactions with free clathrin. AP-2 interactions with assembled cages could also be distinguished from AP-2 binding to clathrin trimers by sodium tripolyphosphate (NaPPPi), which binds to the alpha subunit of AP-2 (Beck, K., and Keen, J. H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 4442-4447). At concentrations of 1-5 mM, NaPPPi blocked clathrin-triskelion binding; in contrast, interactions with cages persisted in the presence of 25 mM NaPPPi. To begin to identify the region(s) of the clathrin molecule important in recognition by AP-2, clathrin cages were proteolyzed to remove heavy chain terminal domains and portions of the distal leg as well as all of the light chains. AP-2 bound to these “clipped cages”; however, unlike the interaction with native cages, binding of AP-2 to clipped cages was sensitive to the lower concentrations of both Tris-HCl and NaPPPi which disrupt interactions of AP-2 with clathrin trimers. Reconstitution of the clipped cages with clathrin light chains did not restore resistance of AP-2 binding to Tris-HCl. We conclude that one binding site for AP-2 resides on the hub and/or proximal part of the clathrin triskelion whereas a second site is likely to involve the terminal domain and/or distal leg; the second site is manifested only in the assembled lattice structure. We suggest that these two distinct binding interactions may be mediated by the two unique large subunits within the AP-2 complex, acting sequentially during assembly.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0021-9258
1083-351X
DOI:10.1016/S0021-9258(20)89541-6