Posterior pericardiotomy reduces the incidence of supra-ventricular arrhythmias and pericardial effusion after coronary artery bypass grafting

Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy in reducing the incidence pericardial effusions and consequently reducing the related supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and development of delayed posterior cardiac effusions. Methods: This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 278 - 281
Main Authors Farsak, Bora, GunaydinGünaydin, Serdar, TokmakogluTokmakoğlu, Hilmi, Kandemir, özer, YorganciogluYorgancioğlu, Cem, Zorlutuna, Yaman
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Science B.V 01.08.2002
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy in reducing the incidence pericardial effusions and consequently reducing the related supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and development of delayed posterior cardiac effusions. Methods: This prospective randomized study was carried out in 150 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in Bayindir Hospital Department of Cardiovascular Surgery between April 2000 and October 2001. One hundred and fifty patients were divided into two groups; each group included 75 patients. A 4-cm longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the left phrenic nerve, extending from the left inferior pulmonary vein to the diaphragm in posterior pericardiotomy group (group I). Posterior pericardiotomy was not performed in conventional treatment group (group II). Results: Atrial fibrillation was developed in seven patients (9.3%) in group I and in 24 patients (32%) in group II (P≪0.001). Atrial flutter and other supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) prevalence was not statistically significant. Early pericardial effusion was developed 42.6% (32/75) and 10.6% (8/75), respectively, in group II and group I (P≪0.0001), but no late pericardial effusion developed in group I despite seven (9.3%) late pericardial effusions developing in group II (P≪0.013). Conclusion: Posterior pericardiotomy is a simple, safe and effective technique for reducing not only the prevalence of early pericardial effusion and related atrial fibrillation but also delayed posterior pericardial effusion and tamponade.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-GJ6QWX3W-6
istex:FC7C4788870824E0A6BE033D3AFCA428CC2261C8
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1010-7940
1873-734X
DOI:10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00259-2