relevance of sublethal effects in honey bee testing for pesticide risk assessment
The option of an evaluation and assessment of possible sublethal effects of pesticides on bees has been a subject of discussion by scientists and regulatory authorities. Effects considered included learning behaviour and orientation capacity. This discussion was enhanced by the French bee issue and...
Saved in:
Published in | Pest management science Vol. 63; no. 11; pp. 1058 - 1061 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.11.2007
Wiley Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The option of an evaluation and assessment of possible sublethal effects of pesticides on bees has been a subject of discussion by scientists and regulatory authorities. Effects considered included learning behaviour and orientation capacity. This discussion was enhanced by the French bee issue and allegations against systemic insecticides that were linked to the hypothesis that sublethal intoxication might even have led to reported colony losses. This paper considers whether and, if so, how sublethal effects should be incorporated into risk assessment, by addressing a number of questions: What is meant by a sublethal effect? Which sublethal effects should be measured, when and how? How are sublethal effects to be included in risk assessments? The authors conclude that sublethal studies may be helpful as an optional test to address particular, compound-specific concerns, as a lower-tier alternative to semi-field or field testing, if the effects are shown to be ecologically relevant. However, available higher-tier data (semi-field, field tests) should make any additional sublethal testing unnecessary, and higher-tier data should always override data of lower-tier trials on sublethal effects. © Crown copyright 2007. Reproduced with the permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.1458 ark:/67375/WNG-6870JJTL-2 istex:F657B8C554F9FFCEA5319DD3BC64E505E45316D5 ArticleID:PS1458 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1526-498X 1526-4998 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ps.1458 |