Exploring the (Very Flat) Potential Energy Landscape of R−Br⋅⋅⋅π Interactions with Accurate CCSD(T) and SAPT Techniques

Halogen bonds involving an aromatic moiety as an acceptor, otherwise known as R−X⋅⋅⋅π interactions, have increasingly been recognized as being important in materials and in protein–ligand complexes. These types of interactions have been the subject of many recent investigations, but little is known...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChemistry : a European journal Vol. 22; no. 49; pp. 17690 - 17695
Main Authors Riley, Kevin E., Vazquez, Mariela, Umemura, Cole, Miller, Christopher, Tran, Khanh-An
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Blackwell Publishing Ltd 05.12.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Halogen bonds involving an aromatic moiety as an acceptor, otherwise known as R−X⋅⋅⋅π interactions, have increasingly been recognized as being important in materials and in protein–ligand complexes. These types of interactions have been the subject of many recent investigations, but little is known about the ways in which the strengths of R−X⋅⋅⋅π interactions vary as a function of the relative geometries of the interacting pairs. Here we use the accurate CCSD(T) and SAPT2+3δMP2 methods to investigate the potential energy landscapes for systems of HBr, HCCBr, and NCBr complexed with benzene. It is found that only the separation between the complexed molecules have a strong effect on interaction strength while other geometric parameters, such as tilting and shifting R−Br⋅⋅⋅π donor relative to the benzene plane, affect these interactions only mildly. Importantly, it is found that the C6v (T‐shaped) configuration is not the global minimum for any of the dimers investigated. Going the distance: High‐level ab initio methods are used to investigate the relationship between interaction strength and geometric parameters in R−Br⋅⋅⋅C6H6 interactions. It is found that the interaction depends strongly on the distance between molecules but only very weakly on other geometric parameters. The C6v structure is found not to be the global minimum.
Bibliography:ArticleID:CHEM201603674
ark:/67375/WNG-ZK96P0PK-8
CCSD(T)=Coupled cluster with a full treatment singles and doubles; SAPT=symmetry-adapted perturbation theory.
istex:DF766B170F65264433D1834C2AA28D08A988DC27
CCSD(T)=Coupled cluster with a full treatment singles and doubles; SAPT=symmetry‐adapted perturbation theory.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0947-6539
1521-3765
1521-3765
DOI:10.1002/chem.201603674