Current therapeutic options for Huntington's disease: Good clinical practice versus evidence-based approaches?

ABSTRACT Therapeutic decision‐making in Huntington's disease (HD) is often guided by clinical experience, because of the limited empirical evidence available. The only medication for HD that has met the regulatory hurdle for approval is tetrabenazine, indicated for the treatment of chorea. Howe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMovement disorders Vol. 29; no. 11; pp. 1404 - 1413
Main Authors Killoran, Annie, Biglan, Kevin M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 15.09.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Therapeutic decision‐making in Huntington's disease (HD) is often guided by clinical experience, because of the limited empirical evidence available. The only medication for HD that has met the regulatory hurdle for approval is tetrabenazine, indicated for the treatment of chorea. However, its use has limitations, and in the setting of specific contraindications or comorbidities the treatment of choice for chorea is still the multipurpose antipsychotics. For the management of psychiatric disturbances, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and mood stabilizers are often used, although empirical evidence is lacking. Finally, no known effective treatment is available for cognitive dysfunction in HD. We discuss the limited evidence available and current expert opinion on medical treatment of the dominant motor, psychiatric, and cognitive features of HD. This follows a brief introduction on the general principles of HD management and on evidence‐based medicine in relation to clinical practice. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
Bibliography:ArticleID:MDS26014
istex:BD52CEF4BA1640552D09B140A86E849C30A34F96
ark:/67375/WNG-DZH4DW0X-M
None.
Complete financial disclosures and author roles may be found in the online version of this article.
Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures
Funding agencies
Dr. Killoran has nothing to report. Dr Biglan has received funding from Lundbeck, HDSA, and PCORI. He has served as a consultant for Lundbeck, KJT consulting, Psyadom Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0885-3185
1531-8257
1531-8257
DOI:10.1002/mds.26014