The relationships between local and regional species richness and spatial turnover

Aim: To determine the empirical relationships between species richness and spatial turnover in species composition across spatial scales. These have remained little explored despite the fact that such relationships are fundamental to understanding spatial diversity patterns. Location: South-east Sco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal ecology and biogeography Vol. 11; no. 5; pp. 363 - 375
Main Authors Koleff, Patricia, Gaston, Kevin J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.09.2002
Blackwell Publishing
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim: To determine the empirical relationships between species richness and spatial turnover in species composition across spatial scales. These have remained little explored despite the fact that such relationships are fundamental to understanding spatial diversity patterns. Location: South-east Scotland. Methods: Defining local species richness simply as the total number of species at a finer resolution than regional species richness and spatial turnover as turnover in species identity between any two or more areas, we determined the empirical relationships between all three, and the influence of spatial scale upon them, using data on breeding bird distributions. We estimated spatial turnover using a measure independent of species richness gradients, a fundamental feature which has been neglected in theoretical studies. Results: Local species richness and spatial turnover exhibited a negative relationship, which became stronger as larger neighbourhood sizes were considered in estimating the latter. Spatial turnover and regional species richness did not show any significant relationship, suggesting that spatial species replacement occurs independently of the size of the regional species pool. Local and regional species richness only showed the expected positive relationship when the size of the local scale was relatively large in relation to the regional scale. Conclusions: Explanations for the relationships between spatial turnover and local and regional species richness can be found in the spatial patterns of species commonality, gain and loss between areas.
Bibliography:istex:547250F6BCC2744B9E7B9C04339B06B1CA60FFF3
ark:/67375/WNG-6F91DLNK-1
ArticleID:GEB302
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1466-822X
1466-8238
DOI:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00302.x