Effect of eosinophil peroxidase on airway epithelial permeability in the guinea pig

• Published in: Pediatric pulmonology Vol. 21; no. 3; p. 159
• Main Authors: Brottman, G M, Regelmann, W E, Slungaard, A, Wangensteen, O D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.03.1996
• Subjects: Animals; Asthma - physiopathology; Cell Membrane Permeability - drug effects; Eosinophil Peroxidase; Eosinophils - enzymology; Epithelial Cells; Epithelium - drug effects; Guinea Pigs; Male; Peroxidases - pharmacokinetics; Trachea - drug effects; Trachea - pathology
• ISSN: 8755-6863
• DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199603)21:3<159::AID-PPUL2>3.0.CO;2-L

Increased numbers of eosinophils and increased concentrations of plasma proteins have been found in the airways of patients with mild asthma. We used an intact guinea pig trachea model to investigate the role of eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) in altering the function of the airway epithelial barrier. EPO in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and bromide (Br(-)) catalyzes the production of hypobromous acid (HOBr), which is felt to have a toxic effect on airway epithelial cells. An intact guinea pig trachea was mounted on an apparatus in a way that would allow the tracheal epithelium to be exposed to different solutions. Following these exposures, a test solution containing (14)C-sucrose (S), (3)H-inulin (I), and FITC-dextran-20 (D) was placed in the tracheal lumen and positioned in the center of the segment for 90 minutes. Flux of these molecules across the epithelial barrier into a bath was measured, and the permeability (P) was calculated for each molecule to quantify epithelial barrier function. Light and electron micrographic studies were performed to assess cellular damage. We found that there was a dose response to EPO (in the presence of fixed amounts of H(2)(O)(2) and Br(-)). EPO at 7.3 x 10(-7) M caused no increase in P over controls (Ringer's solution alone) for S, I, or D (P> 0.05), whereas EPO at 2.7 x 10(-6) M caused a significant increase in P over controls (P = 0.008) for all test molecules. Light and electron micrographs of the latter tracheas showed no evidence of microscopic changes despite the increased P. Further testing verified that the increase in permeability was caused by the EPO catalyzed reaction and not the individual substrates themselves, and that the reaction was inhibited by a peroxidase inhibitor. We conclude that EPO can alter the barrier function of the airway epithelium before gross cellular damage becomes visible. We hypothesize that changes in the tight junctions are responsible for the alteration in the barrier function of the airway epithelium and that this may play an important role in the pathophysiology of mild asthma.