Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum-sensitive recurrent advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GEICO (Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario) study

Background:: The aim of this study was to determine whether the response rate for the paclitaxel–carboplatin combination is superior to carboplatin alone in the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Patients and methods:: Patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of oncology Vol. 16; no. 5; pp. 749 - 755
Main Authors González-Martín, A. J., Calvo, E., Bover, I., Rubio, M. J., Arcusa, A., Casado, A., Ojeda, B., Balañá, C., Martínez, E., Herrero, A., Pardo, B., Adrover, E., Rifá, J., Godes, M. J., Moyano, A., Cervantes, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.05.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:: The aim of this study was to determine whether the response rate for the paclitaxel–carboplatin combination is superior to carboplatin alone in the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Patients and methods:: Patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma, 6 months after treatment with a platinum-based regimen and with no more than two previous chemotherapy lines, were randomized to receive carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 (arm A) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 5 (arm B). The primary end point was objective response, following a ‘pick up the winner’ design. Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), overall survival, tolerability and quality of life (QoL). Results:: Eighty-one patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The response rate in arm B was 75.6% [26.8% complete response (CR) + 48.8% partial response (PR)] [95% confidence interval (CI) 59.7% to 87.6%] and 50% in arm A (20% CR + 30% PR) (95% CI 33.8% to 66.2%). No significant differences were observed in grade 3–4 hematological toxicity. Conversely, mucositis, myalgia/arthralgia and peripheral neurophaty were more frequent in arm B. Median TTP was 49.1 weeks in arm B (95% CI 36.9–61.3) and 33.7 weeks in arm A (95% CI 25.8–41.5). No significant differences were found in the QoL analysis. Conclusions:: Paclitaxel–carboplatin combination is a tolerable regimen with a higher response rate than carboplatin monotherapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma.
Bibliography:istex:6B3416A66A70A8CBA95163A81ED95F4CE465AF5D
href:mdi147.pdf
local:mdi147
ark:/67375/HXZ-DR4P2VHL-7
Correspondence to: Dr A. J. González Martín, Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo Km. 9,100, Madrid, Spain. Tel: +34-91-336-8263; Fax: +34-91-336-8263; Email: agonzalezm@seom.org
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdi147