In citizenship we trust?: The citizenship question need not impede Puerto Rican decolonization

Puerto Rico is an uncomfortable reminder of the democratic deficits within the world's oldest constitutional democracy. Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens who live in a U.S. territory that is subject to the plenary authority of Congress, to which they cannot elect voting members. In 2022, under un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMichigan law review Vol. 122; no. 5; pp. 963 - 995
Main Author McDonough, Jimmy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ann Arbor, MI United States University of Michigan Law School 01.03.2024
Michigan Law Review Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0026-2234
1939-8557
DOI10.36644/mlr.122.5.citizenship

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Puerto Rico is an uncomfortable reminder of the democratic deficits within the world's oldest constitutional democracy. Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens who live in a U.S. territory that is subject to the plenary authority of Congress, to which they cannot elect voting members. In 2022, under unified Democratic control for the first time in a decade, Congressconsidered the Puerto Rico Status Act, legislation that would finally decolonize Puerto Rico. The Status Act offered Puerto Rican voters three alternatives to the colonial status quo-statehood, independence, or sovereignty in free association-and committed Congress to implementing whichever alternative won majority support from Puerto Rican voters. The Status Act sought to define how any change in status would affect Puerto Ricans' access to U.S.citizenship. The Status Act proposed that all Puerto Ricans would retain their U.S. citizenship if Puerto Rico became independent or entered free association but included special restrictions that would limit Puerto Ricans' ability to pass on their U.S. citizenship to children born after a change in status. While this Note appreciates the Status Act's efforts to decolonize Puerto Rico, it argues that the Status Act erred in proposing this specialized regime for citizenship claims. Instead, it contends that the existing derivative citizenship framework would better regulate citizenship for Puerto Rican U.S. citizens born after a change in status. Although the Status Act died in the Senate, it represents a new and influential formula for decolonizing Puerto Rico. Future proponents of status reform should draw on the existing derivative citizenship law because it offers clearer provisions that can better ensure a large number of Puerto Ricans may rely on U.S. citizenship-a benefit Puerto Ricans themselves clearly value-even after a change in status.
Bibliography:MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, Vol. 122, No. 5, Mar 2024, 963-995
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0026-2234
1939-8557
DOI:10.36644/mlr.122.5.citizenship