The role of coffee agroforestry in the conservation of tree diversity and community composition of native forests in a Biosphere Reserve

•We compared tree diversity and composition between coffee agroforests and forests.•At landscape level agroforests conserve comparable tree species richness to forests.•At plot level agroforests harbor lower tree species diversity than forests.•Agroforests have different tree species composition and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAgriculture, ecosystems & environment Vol. 189; pp. 154 - 163
Main Authors Valencia, Vivian, García-Barrios, Luis, West, Paige, Sterling, Eleanor J., Naeem, Shahid
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier B.V 01.05.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We compared tree diversity and composition between coffee agroforests and forests.•At landscape level agroforests conserve comparable tree species richness to forests.•At plot level agroforests harbor lower tree species diversity than forests.•Agroforests have different tree species composition and are dominated by Inga spp.•Agroforests have higher proportions of pioneers and lower of conservation concern trees. Agroforestry is considered a promising alternative to conventional agriculture that can both conserve biodiversity and support local livelihoods. Coffee agroforestry may be particularly important for sustaining trees of conservation concern and late-successional stage, but this possibility remains unclear. Here, we examined whether coffee agroforestry systems can serve as conservation reservoirs of tree species native to nearby forests. We compared tree diversity, composition and structure between coffee agroforests and forests in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. We found that, although at the landscape level the full set of coffee agroforests appears to conserve comparable tree species richness to nearby native forests, the species composition that is being conserved is different. Coffee agroforests had a lower proportion of trees of conservation concern, a higher proportion of pioneer trees, were dominated by Inga spp., harbored lower tree species diversity at the plot level, and were composed of different tree species compared to native forests. We suggest that conservation practitioners and policy makers seeking to promote coffee agroforestry as a conservation strategy should consider how such agroforestry systems differ in species diversity and composition from the native forests of conservation interest. Further, promoting different coffee agroforest management strategies, such as discouraging the replacement of diverse agroforest canopies with Inga-dominated canopies, would help improve the conservation value of coffee agroforests through more sustainable practices.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-8809
1873-2305
DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.024