Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

Purpose To identify any MRI predictors for surgical outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) having instrumented posterior decompression (IPD) surgery. Materials and methods Seventy patients with DLSS who underwent IPD were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical score of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese journal of radiology Vol. 30; no. 10; pp. 811 - 818
Main Authors Alicioglu, Banu, Yilmaz, Baris, Bulakbasi, Nail, Copuroglu, Cem, Yalniz, Erol, Aykac, Bilal, Urut, Devrim Ulas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Springer Japan 01.12.2012
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To identify any MRI predictors for surgical outcomes of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) having instrumented posterior decompression (IPD) surgery. Materials and methods Seventy patients with DLSS who underwent IPD were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical score of each patient was assessed using the JOAS (Japanese Orthopedics Association Scoring) system, which is mainly based on the subjective symptoms and physical signs of the patients before (JOAS-I) and after (JOAS-II) surgery. Healing rate (HR) was calculated as: [(JOAS-II) − (JOAS-I)] × 100/[15 − (JOAS-I)]. HR >50 % was considered clinical improvement. Radiological stenosis was assessed on MRI and was graded from 0 to 3 at the laminectomy level in terms of thecal sac-nerve root compression, foraminal stenosis, and facet degeneration. Results Mean HR of the improved patients ( n  = 39) was 81.94; HR of the unimproved patients ( n  = 31) was 34.75 ( p  < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in radiological stenosis parameters between the two groups ( p  > 0.05). HR was worse in patients with severe facet degeneration. Conclusions Surgical outcomes of DLSS depend on multiple variables. It is not possible to predict the outcomes by assessing only one parameter. The possible outcomes should be analyzed by considering all the factors individually.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1867-1071
1867-108X
DOI:10.1007/s11604-012-0125-0