Lack of association between the G+2044A polymorphism of interleukin-13 gene and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis
Numerous studies have investigated association of interleukin-13 (IL-13) G+2044A polymorphism with COPD susceptibility; however, the results were inconsistent and inconclusive. To evaluate the association between the IL-13 G+2044A polymorphism and susceptibility to COPD, a meta-analysis of published...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecular biology reports Vol. 41; no. 9; pp. 6297 - 6303 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Dordrecht
Springer-Verlag
01.09.2014
Springer Netherlands Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Numerous studies have investigated association of interleukin-13 (IL-13) G+2044A polymorphism with COPD susceptibility; however, the results were inconsistent and inconclusive. To evaluate the association between the IL-13 G+2044A polymorphism and susceptibility to COPD, a meta-analysis of published case–control studies was performed. Based on PubMed and Chinese database, this research selected studies that examined the association of the IL-13 G+2044A polymorphism with COPD. A genetic model-free approach was used to assess whether the combined data showed this association. Then a subgroup analysis was also performed, with stratifications for race, study design, and sample size. Six studies (total 1,213 COPD patients and 801 control subjects) for the IL-13 G+2044A polymorphism with COPD were included in the meta-analysis (G- vs A-allele: OR 1.12, 95 % CI 0.96–1.32, P = 0.15; genotypes GG+GA vs genotype AA: OR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.49–2.00, P = 0.98; genotype GG vs genotypes GA+AA: OR 1.18, 95 % CI 0.97–1.44, P = 0.09; genotype GA vs genotypes GG+AA: OR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.70–1.04, P = 0.11). This meta-analysis demonstrates that the IL-13 G+2044A polymorphism does not confer susceptibility to COPD. More detailed data about individual and environment, larger sample sizes with unbiased genotyping methods and matched controls in different populations are required. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3512-z ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0301-4851 1573-4978 1573-4978 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11033-014-3512-z |