Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession

The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest success...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences Vol. 378; no. 1867; p. 20210074
Main Authors van der Sande, Masha T., Powers, Jennifer S., Kuyper, Thom W., Norden, Natalia, Salgado-Negret, Beatriz, Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene, Bongers, Frans, Delgado, Diego, Dent, Daisy H., Derroire, Géraldine, do Espirito Santo, Mario Marcos, Dupuy, Juan Manuel, Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson, Finegan, Bryan, Gavito, Mayra E., Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis, Jakovac, Catarina C., Jones, Isabel L., das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria, Meave, Jorge A., Mora, Francisco, Muñoz, Rodrigo, Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia, Piotto, Daniel, Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban, Caceres-Siani, Yasmani, Dalban-Pilon, Coralie, Dourdain, Aurélie, Du, Dan V., García Villalobos, Daniel, Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira, Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo, Poorter, Lourens
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Royal Society, The 02.01.2023
The Royal Society Publishing
The Royal Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chronosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e. crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1–95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and laboratory analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C : N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
The European Research Council (ERC)
Univ. Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM
Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI)
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Fundacão de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
SC0014363; PQ 309965/2016-0; 308877/2019-5; PPM-00623-16; PPM-00726-16; PPM-00627-16; ANR-10-LABEX-0025; IAI-CRN 3025; CRN 3-025; 88881.337120/2019-01; 308471/2017-2; YUC-2008-C06-108863; SEP-2015-255544; 442371/2019-5; 834775; DPAGA–PAPIIT IN218416; DPAGA–PAPIIT IN217620; PAPIIT-UNAM IN211417; NWO-ALWOP.457
French National Research Agency (ANR)
Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6248919.
One contribution of 20 to a theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.
ISSN:0962-8436
1471-2970
1471-2970
DOI:10.1098/rstb.2021.0074