Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for estimating limb lean mass in free-living Caucasian elderly people

Aging is characterized by a loss of limb lean mass (LLM) that can lead to physical disability and death. Regional bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) may be a reliable method for estimating LLM, but no prediction equations are available for elderly Caucasian subjects. The aim of this study was to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 577 - 584
Main Authors De Rui, Marina, Veronese, Nicola, Bolzetta, Francesco, Berton, Linda, Carraro, Sara, Bano, Giulia, Trevisan, Caterina, Pizzato, Simona, Coin, Alessandra, Perissinotto, Egle, Manzato, Enzo, Sergi, Giuseppe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0261-5614
1532-1983
1532-1983
DOI10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.011

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aging is characterized by a loss of limb lean mass (LLM) that can lead to physical disability and death. Regional bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) may be a reliable method for estimating LLM, but no prediction equations are available for elderly Caucasian subjects. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a BIA-based equation for predicting LLM in healthy elderly Caucasians, taking dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method. Using a cross-sectional design, 244 free-living healthy Caucasian subjects (117 men, 179 women) over 60 years of age were enrolled. LLM was measured with DXA (LLMDXA), and the resistance (Rz) and reactance (Xc) of each limb were measured with a regional bioelectrical impedance analyzer. A resistive index (RI) was calculated from stature in meters divided by Rz of each arm. A BIA-based multiple regression equation for predicting the lean mass (LM) of dominant and non-dominant limbs was developed using a double cross-validation technique. Using the sample as a whole, cross-validation resulted in an equation specific for each limb, as follows, where sex equals 1 for males, and 0 for females: LM (kg) = −0.081 + (0.061*RI) + (0.010*body weight) + (0.299*sex) for the dominant arm; LM (kg) = −0.026 + (0.014*RI) + (0.009*body weight) + (0.352*sex) for the non-dominant arm; LM (kg) = −0.462 + (0.027*RI) + (0.047*body weight) + (0.639*sex) + (0.026*Xc) for the dominant leg; and for the non-dominant leg, LM (kg) = −0.522 + (0.029*RI) + (0.045*body weight) + (0.569*sex) + (0.025*Xc). The DXA-measured and BIA-predicted LLM for each limb did not differ significantly. Our newly-developed BIA equations seem to provide a valid estimation of LLM in older Caucasian adults.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0261-5614
1532-1983
1532-1983
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.011