Nudging generosity: Choice architecture and cognitive factors in charitable giving

•We study donations to charities in a paper-and-pen experiment.•In the treatment group, subjects can either specify a charity of their choice, or select one from a list of five well-known charities; in the control group we do not provide a list.•Eliciting donations with the list doubles the amount d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of behavioral and experimental economics Vol. 74; pp. 139 - 145
Main Authors Schulz, Jonathan F., Thiemann, Petra, Thöni, Christian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.06.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We study donations to charities in a paper-and-pen experiment.•In the treatment group, subjects can either specify a charity of their choice, or select one from a list of five well-known charities; in the control group we do not provide a list.•Eliciting donations with the list doubles the amount donated relative to the control treatment.•The increase is driven by a change on the extensive margin, while the distribution of donations conditional on donating is almost identical across treatment. In an experimental setup we investigate the effect of two different choice architectures on donation decisions. In the treatment group, subjects can either specify a charity of their choice, or select one from a list of five well-known charities; in the control group we do not provide a list. In a sample of 869 subjects we find a large treatment effect: Offering a list of default charities doubles the fraction of donors, as well as the revenue for charities. We find that the treatment intervention particularly affects subjects who tend to make intuitive choices.
ISSN:2214-8043
2214-8051
2214-8051
DOI:10.1016/j.socec.2018.04.001