Estimation of Salivary and Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Levels in Individuals with Oral Cancer, Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders, Tobacco Users, and Healthy Subjects - A Pilot Study

• Published in: Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 417 - 421
• Main Authors: Subramanian, Mohithan, Fenn, Saramma Mathew, Reddy, Gowda Venkatesha Ramachandra, Rajarammohan, Karthik, Thangavelu, Ravikumar Pethagounder
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 01.10.2024; Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd; Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd; Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
• Edition: 2
• Subjects: Analysis; Cancer; Cancer patients; Centrifugation; L-Lactate dehydrogenase; lactate dehydrogenase; Metastases; Mouth cancer; Oncology, Experimental; Oral cancer; oral potentially malignant disorders; Original Article; Patient compliance; Public health; Saliva; salivary biomarker; serum; Statistical analysis; Tobacco; United States; saliva; salivary biomarker; Lactate dehydrogenase; oral potentially malignant disorders; serum; oral cancer
• ISSN: 0972-1363; 0975-1572
• DOI: 10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_6_24

Background: Oral cancer represents a major global health concern, accounting for approximately 11 million new cases and over 6 million deaths annually. Early detection and accurate prediction of metastasis are critical in improving outcomes. Objectives: To evaluate serum and salivary LDH levels and their correlation among oral cancer patients, potential malignant disorders, tobacco users, and healthy individuals. Methods: The study divided 120 participants into four groups: Group A (oral cancer), Group B (potentially malignant disorders), Group C (tobacco users), and a control group of 30 healthy individuals. Saliva and serum samples (2 ml each) were collected, stored at -20°C, and analyzed within 24 hours following centrifugation. Both serum and saliva were analyzed using an LDH kit (Liquizyme) on a semi-auto analyzer. Following the collection of values, statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA and Pearson's correlation. Results: One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in salivary LDH levels among groups (Controls: 82.00 IU/L, Tobacco users: 106.97 IU/L, Potentially malignant group: 157.23 IU/L, Oral cancer group: 193.73 IU/L, P < 0.05). Pearson's correlation indicated positive correlations in oral cancer (r = 0.1295), potential malignant disorder (r = 0.0961), and healthy individuals (r = 0.2402), while tobacco users showed a negative correlation (r = -0.0849). Conclusion: The study has shown that salivary LDH is preferable to serum LDH for early detection and monitoring, showing significant elevation in oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders, with the advantage of non-invasive method of collection.