Appraisal and coping processes among chronic low back pain patients

Objectives:  Appraisals and coping play important roles in musculoskeletal disorders, but how these aspects develop over time remains unknown. The aim of the current study was to examine the development of pain‐related appraisals, coping and well behaviours among chronic low back pain (CLBP) patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScandinavian journal of caring sciences Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 396 - 402
Main Author Busch, Hillevi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives:  Appraisals and coping play important roles in musculoskeletal disorders, but how these aspects develop over time remains unknown. The aim of the current study was to examine the development of pain‐related appraisals, coping and well behaviours among chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Methods:  Twenty‐two outpatients (15 women, 7 men) of working age were interviewed about past and present experiences of CLBP. The interviews were analysed using Grounded theory. Results:  The majority of the participants used disregarding processes in response to CLBP. The disregarding process developed from a psychological defence into a conscious coping strategy, the transition mediated by a crisis. This defence seemed to protect the participants’ self‐concept and reduce emotional discomfort, although it did not promote rehabilitation. The disregarding strategy was usually employed in later phases of the disorder and was consistent with active attempts at changing pain‐related behaviours. Study limitation:  Most of the participants had experienced CLBP for several years, thus the risk of memory bias cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, the sample was composed of relatively healthy subjects, thus the findings may not apply to chronic low back patients in general. Conclusion:  Acceptance of CLBP favoured rehabilitation and helped participants change pain‐related behaviours.
Bibliography:ArticleID:SCS348
istex:C5D45D71DF2CF994786C1E7620FD603236FAD6AA
ark:/67375/WNG-13PJCFC3-V
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0283-9318
1471-6712
DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00348.x