Imaging studies for diagnosing Graves’ orbitopathy and dysthyroid optic neuropathy
Although the diagnosis of Graves’ orbitopathy is primarily made clinically based on laboratory tests indicative of thyroid dysfunction and autoimmunity, imaging studies, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and color Doppler imaging, play an important role both in the...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinics (São Paulo, Brazil) Vol. 67; no. 11; pp. 1327 - 1334 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English Portuguese |
Published |
Brazil
Elsevier España, S.L.U
01.11.2012
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Although the diagnosis of Graves’ orbitopathy is primarily made clinically based on laboratory tests indicative of thyroid dysfunction and autoimmunity, imaging studies, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and color Doppler imaging, play an important role both in the diagnosis and follow-up after clinical or surgical treatment of the disease. Imaging studies can be used to evaluate morphological abnormalities of the orbital structures during the diagnostic workup when a differential diagnosis versus other orbital diseases is needed. Imaging may also be useful to distinguish the inflammatory early stage from the inactive stage of the disease. Finally, imaging studies can be of great help in identifying patients prone to develop dysthyroid optic neuropathy and therefore enabling the timely diagnosis and treatment of the condition, avoiding permanent visual loss. In this paper, we review the imaging modalities that aid in the diagnosis and management of Graves’ orbitopathy, with special emphasis on the diagnosis of optic nerve dysfunction in this condition. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 Gonçalves AC contributed to the review of the literature and writing of the manuscript. Gebrim EM revised the manuscript. Monteiro ML wrote and revised the manuscript. |
ISSN: | 1807-5932 1980-5322 1980-5322 |
DOI: | 10.6061/clinics/2012(11)18 |