In Silico Identification of Promising New Pyrazole Derivative-Based Small Molecules for Modulating CRMP2, C-RAF, CYP17, VEGFR, C-KIT, and HDAC—Application towards Cancer Therapeutics

• Published in: Current Issues in Molecular Biology Vol. 44; no. 11; pp. 5312 - 5351
• Main Authors: Bennani, Fatima Ezzahra, Karrouchi, Khalid, Doudach, Latifa, Scrima, Mario, Rahman, Noor, Rastrelli, Luca, Tallei, Trina Ekawati, Rudd, Christopher E, Faouzi, My El Abbes, Ansar, M’hammed
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 31.10.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Antimitotic agents; Antineoplastic agents; Cancer; cancer targets; Care and treatment; Drug resistance; Health aspects; Liver cancer; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; molecular docking; molecular dynamic simulation; Proteins; pyrazole derivatives; Sulfinpyrazone; Vascular endothelial growth factor; Morocco
• ISSN: 1467-3045; 1467-3037; 1467-3045
• DOI: 10.3390/cimb44110361

Despite continual efforts being made with multiple clinical studies and deploying cutting-edge diagnostic tools and technologies, the discovery of new cancer therapies remains of severe worldwide concern. Multiple drug resistance has also emerged in several cancer cell types, leaving them unresponsive to the many cancer treatments. Such a condition always prompts the development of next-generation cancer therapies that have a better chance of inhibiting selective target macromolecules with less toxicity. Therefore, in the present study, extensive computational approaches were implemented combining molecular docking and dynamic simulation studies for identifying potent pyrazole-based inhibitors or modulators for CRMP2, C-RAF, CYP17, c-KIT, VEGFR, and HDAC proteins. All of these proteins are in some way linked to the development of numerous forms of cancer, including breast, liver, prostate, kidney, and stomach cancers. In order to identify potential compounds, 63 in-house synthesized pyrazole-derivative compounds were docked with each selected protein. In addition, single or multiple standard drug compounds of each protein were also considered for docking analyses and their results used for comparison purposes. Afterward, based on the binding affinity and interaction profile of pyrazole compounds of each protein, potentially strong compounds were filtered out and further subjected to 1000 ns MD simulation analyses. Analyzing parameters such as RMSD, RMSF, RoG and protein–ligand contact maps were derived from trajectories of simulated protein–ligand complexes. All these parameters turned out to be satisfactory and within the acceptable range to support the structural integrity and interaction stability of the protein–ligand complexes in dynamic state. Comprehensive computational analyses suggested that a few identified pyrazole compounds, such as M33, M36, M72, and M76, could be potential inhibitors or modulators for HDAC, C-RAF, CYP72 and VEGFR proteins, respectively. Another pyrazole compound, M74, turned out to be a very promising dual inhibitor/modulator for CRMP2 and c-KIT proteins. However, more extensive study may be required for further optimization of the selected chemical framework of pyrazole derivatives to yield improved inhibitory activity against each studied protein receptor.