Comparison between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Splenic Volumetry to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis Staging in Preoperative Patients

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 20; p. 3200
• Main Authors: Arakane, Takayuki, Okada, Masahiro, Nakazawa, Yujiro, Tago, Kenichiro, Yoshikawa, Hiroki, Mizuno, Mariko, Abe, Hayato, Higaki, Tokio, Okamura, Yukiyasu, Takayama, Tadatoshi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.10.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Biopsy; computed tomography (CT); diffusion-weighted imaging; Fibrosis; hepatic fibrosis; intravoxel incoherent motion; Liver cirrhosis; Liver diseases; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Patients; Review boards; Spleen; United States > US
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203200

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and splenic volumetry (SV) for hepatic fibrosis (HF) prediction have been reported to be effective. Our purpose is to compare the HF prediction of IVIM and SV in 67 patients with pathologically staged HF. SV was divided by body surface area (BSA). IVIM indices, such as slow diffusion-coefficient related to molecular diffusion (D), fast diffusion-coefficient related to perfusion in microvessels (D*), apparent diffusion-coefficient (ADC), and perfusion related diffusion-fraction (f), were calculated by two observers (R1/R2). D (p = 0.718 for R1, p = 0.087 for R2) and D* (p = 0.513, p = 0.708, respectively) showed a poor correlation with HF. ADC (p = 0.034, p = 0.528, respectively) and f (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively) decreased as HF progressed, whereas SV/BSA increased (p = 0.015 for R1). The AUCs of SV/BSA (0.649–0.698 for R1) were higher than those of f (0.575–0.683 for R1 + R2) for severe HF (≥F3–4 and ≥F4), although AUCs of f (0.705–0.790 for R1 + R2) were higher than those of SV/BSA (0.628 for R1) for mild or no HF (≤F0–1). No significant differences to identify HF were observed between IVIM and SV/BSA. SV/BSA allows a higher estimation for evaluating severe HF than IVIM. IVIM is more suitable than SV/BSA for the assessment of mild or no HF.