Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Filter Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque ― 1-Year Follow up of the VAMPIRE 3 (Vacuum Aspiration Thrombus Reemoval 3) Trial

Background:Selective use of distal filter protection during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) decreased the incidence of no-reflow phenomena and in-hospital serious adverse cardiac events compared with conventional PCI in patients with attenuated plaque ≥5 m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation Journal Vol. 85; no. 1; pp. 44 - 49
Main Authors Hibi, Kiyoshi, Kozuma, Ken, Maejima, Nobuhiko, Sonoda, Shinjo, Endo, Tsutomu, Tanaka, Hiroyuki, Kyono, Hiroyuki, Koshida, Ryoji, Ishihara, Takayuki, Awata, Masaki, Kume, Teruyoshi, Tanabe, Kengo, Morino, Yoshihiro, Tsukahara, Kengo, Ikari, Yuji, Fujii, Kenshi, Yamasaki, Masao, Yamanaka, Takeharu, Sumiyoshi, Tetsuya, Yoshino, Hideaki, Kimura, Kazuo, Isshiki, Takaaki, for the VAMPIRE 3 Investigators
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Circulation Society 25.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:Selective use of distal filter protection during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) decreased the incidence of no-reflow phenomena and in-hospital serious adverse cardiac events compared with conventional PCI in patients with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm; however, its long-term clinical outcome remains unknown.Methods and Results:Patients who had ACS with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm were assigned to receive distal protection (DP) (n=98) or conventional treatment (CT) (n=96). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of death from any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year, was the pre-specified secondary endpoint of the trial. MACE at 1 year occurred in 12 patients (12.2%) in the DP group and 3 patients (3.1%) in the CT group (P=0.029), which was driven by a higher risk of TVR (11 [11.2%] vs. 2 [2.1%], P=0.018). In patients treated with bare-metal stents (n=42), MACE occurred in 25.0% of the patients in the DP group and in none of the patients in the CT group (P=0.029), whereas in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (n=151), rates of MACE were similar in the groups (8.1% vs. 3.9%, P=0.32).Conclusions:In ACS patients with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm, the 1-year rates of MACE were higher in the DP group than in the CT group. This effect might be mitigated by the use of drug-eluting stents.
ISSN:1346-9843
1347-4820
DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0449