Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective

► We apply a social dilemma analysis to prosocial behavior at work. ► This predicts future orientation moderates ostracism and prosocial behavior. ► Three studies (survey, experimental, field) test this prediction. ► Future orientation reduces the effect of ostracism on prosocial behavior at work. P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrganizational behavior and human decision processes Vol. 120; no. 2; pp. 298 - 308
Main Authors Balliet, Daniel, Ferris, D.Lance
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 01.03.2013
Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► We apply a social dilemma analysis to prosocial behavior at work. ► This predicts future orientation moderates ostracism and prosocial behavior. ► Three studies (survey, experimental, field) test this prediction. ► Future orientation reduces the effect of ostracism on prosocial behavior at work. Prior research has yielded mixed findings regarding the relation of ostracism to prosocial behavior, with studies indicating ostracism leads people to become less prosocial, more prosocial, or that prosocial behavior is unaffected by workplace ostracism. By conceptualizing prosocial behavior at work as a social dilemma, we hypothesized that whether or not individuals reduce prosocial behaviors following ostracism can be understood by how individuals manage the conflict between the immediate temptation to treat others poorly and the long-term benefits of not giving into such temptations. Across three studies – a scenario (Study 1), experimental (Study 2), and field study on employed adults (Study 3) – we find support for the hypothesis that individuals who are less (versus more) oriented towards future outcomes engage in less prosocial behaviors with others who have ostracized them during prior interactions. We discuss both the practical and theoretical implications of these findings.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ISSN:0749-5978
1095-9920
DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.004