Performance of EQ-5D, howRu and Oxford hip & knee scores in assessing the outcome of hip and knee replacements

• Published in: BMC health services research Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 512
• Main Authors: Benson, Tim, Williams, Dan H, Potts, Henry W W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 22.09.2016; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Confidence intervals; Joint replacement surgery; Patients; Questionnaires; EQ-5D; Total knee arthroplasty; Oxford knee Score; Patient-reported outcome measures; Oxford hip score; Total hip arthroplasty; howRu
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1759-x

We aimed to compare the performance of EQ-5D-3 L and howRu, which are short generic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), in assessing the outcome of hip and knee replacements, using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) for comparison. Outcome was assessed as the difference between pre-surgery and 6-month post-surgery scores. We used a large sample from the NHS PROMs database, which used EQ-5D-3 L, and a small cohort of patients having the same operations collected by MyClinicalOutcomes (MCO), which used howRu. Both cohorts completed the OHS (hips) or the OKS (knees). The change (outcome) between pre-op and post-op scores as measured by howRu was greater than that measured by EQ-5D, relative to that measured by OHS or OKS. For hip replacements, the correlation for change measured by howRu and OHS was r = 0.77 (0.66-0.85). The corresponding correlation for change measured by EQ-5D Index and OHS was r = 0.64 (0.63-0.64). For knee replacements the correlation between change in howRu and OKS was r = 0.86 (0.75-0.92); between EQ-5D Index and OKS r = 0.59 (0.58-0.60). For hip and knee replacement, the outcome measured by howRu was more highly correlated with that measured by the condition-specific Oxford Hip and Knee Scores than were EQ-5D Index or EQ-VAS. The magnitude of change before and after surgery was also greater.