Central wave reflection is associated with peripheral arterial resistance in addition to arterial stiffness in subjects without antihypertensive medication

• Published in: BMC cardiovascular disorders Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 131
• Main Authors: Wilenius, Matias, Tikkakoski, Antti J., Tahvanainen, Anna M., Haring, Antti, Koskela, Jenni, Huhtala, Heini, Kähönen, Mika, Kööbi, Tiit, Mustonen, Jukka T., Pörsti, Ilkka H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 07.06.2016; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis; Antihypertensive drugs; Arteries; Blood Pressure; Cardiography, Impedance; Clinical trials; Dosage and administration; Female; Heart beat; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypertension - diagnosis; Hypertension - physiopathology; Linear Models; Male; Manometry; Middle Aged; Models, Cardiovascular; Multivariate Analysis; Plethysmography, Whole Body; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulse Wave Analysis; Sex Distribution; Stenosis; Stroke Volume; Vascular Resistance; Vascular Stiffness; Young Adult; Systemic vascular resistance; Augmentation index; Arterial stiffness; Central wave reflection
• ISSN: 1471-2261; 1471-2261
• DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0303-6

Augmentation index, a marker of central wave reflection, is influenced by age, sex, height, blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial stiffness. However, the detailed haemodynamic determinants of augmentation index, and their relations, remain uncertain. We examined the association of augmentation index with vascular resistance and other haemodynamic and non-haemodynamic factors. Background information, laboratory values, and haemodynamics of 488 subjects (239 men, 249 women) without antihypertensive medication were obtained. Indices of central wave reflection, systemic vascular resistance, cardiac function, and pulse wave velocity were measured using continuous radial pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography. In a regression model including only haemodynamic variables, augmentation index in males and female subjects, respectively, was associated with systemic vascular resistance (β = 0.425, β = 0.336), pulse wave velocity (β = 0.409, β = 0.400) (P < 0.001 for all), stroke volume (β = 0.256, β = 0.278) (P = 0.001 for both) and heart rate (β = -0.150, β = -0.156) (P = 0.049 and P = 0.036). When age, height, weight, smoking habits, and laboratory values were included in the regression model, the most significant explanatory variables for augmentation index in males and females, respectively, were age (β = 0.577, β = 0.557) and systemic vascular resistance (β = 0.437, β = 0.295) (P < 0.001 for all). In the final regression model, pulse wave velocity was not a significant explanatory variable for augmentation index, probably due to the high correlation of this variable with age (Spearman's correlation ≥0.617). Augmentation index is strongly associated with systemic vascular resistance in addition to arterial stiffness. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01742702 .