Individually dosed omalizumab facilitates peanut oral immunotherapy in peanut allergic adolescents
Background Peanut oral immunotherapy (pOIT) has showed good short‐term outcomes, but allergic reactions may prevent effective up‐dosing and is a major cause of stopping OIT. In placebo‐controlled trials, omalizumab has been shown to facilitate allergen immunotherapy and increase tolerance to peanut....
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical and experimental allergy Vol. 49; no. 10; pp. 1328 - 1341 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.10.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0954-7894 1365-2222 1365-2222 |
DOI | 10.1111/cea.13469 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Peanut oral immunotherapy (pOIT) has showed good short‐term outcomes, but allergic reactions may prevent effective up‐dosing and is a major cause of stopping OIT. In placebo‐controlled trials, omalizumab has been shown to facilitate allergen immunotherapy and increase tolerance to peanut.
Objective
We hypothesized that by combining omalizumab with pOIT, and monitor treatment effects with basophil allergen threshold sensitivity tests (CD‐sens), peanut allergic patients could safely initiate pOIT and thereafter slowly withdraw omalizumab.
Methods
This is the 2nd part of a one‐armed open phase‐2 study where peanut allergic adolescents (n = 23) started pOIT after an individualized omalizumab treatment. The pOIT dose was increased from 280 to 2800 mg peanut protein in 8 weeks followed by an individualized step‐wise withdrawal of omalizumab, based on clinical symptoms and CD‐sens levels. pOIT continued for 12 weeks followed by an open peanut challenge. Peanut CD‐sens and allergen‐binding activity (ABA) and IgE‐ab, IgG‐ab and IgG4‐ab to peanut and its components were measured during the study.
Results
All 23 patients successfully reached the 2800 mg maintenance dose. Moderate/systemic allergic reactions were rare while receiving full‐dose omalizumab. Eleven of 23 (48%) successfully continued with pOIT after omalizumab was stopped. Compared to treatment failures, median baseline IgE‐ab to peanut components Ara h 1‐3 and CD‐sens to peanut were significantly lower among successfully treated patients and IgG4‐ab to peanut, Ara h 2 and 6 increased significantly more during treatment.
Conclusions and clinical relevance
This study indicates that omalizumab is an effective adjunctive therapy for initiation and rapid up‐dosing of pOIT; however, adverse events from pOIT become more frequent as omalizumab doses are decreased.
Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02402231. EudraCT; 2012‐005625‐78. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information Data Availability Statement Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions. This work was supported by Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association, Stockholm City Council, Sachs's Children and Youth Hospital, Center for Allergy Research (Karolinska Institutet), Hesselman's Foundation, Frimurare Barnhuset Foundation (Freemasons of Sweden), Konsul Th C Bergh's Foundation, research grant in memory of Kerstin Hejdenberg, Samariten Foundation, Her Royal Highness Crown Princess Lovisa's research fund, Mjölkdroppen Foundation, ÅkeWiberg's Foundation and Torsten Söderberg's foundation. MV is a postdoctoral researcher funded by the Karin and Sten Mörtstedt Initiative on Anaphylaxis. The funding sources had no role in planning, designing or execution of this study, neither did they have any role in collecting, analysing and reporting of data and results. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0954-7894 1365-2222 1365-2222 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cea.13469 |