Horizontal ridge augmentation of the atrophic anterior maxilla using rhBMP-2/ACS or autogenous bone grafts: a proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial

Aim To compare the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐2) in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier (ACS) with autogenous bone graft for augmentation of the edentulous atrophic anterior maxilla. Methods Twenty‐four subjects were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, parall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical periodontology Vol. 40; no. 10; pp. 968 - 975
Main Authors de Freitas, Rubens Moreno, Susin, Cristiano, Spin-Neto, Rubens, Marcantonio, Claudio, Wikesjö, Ulf M. E., Pereira, Luís Antônio Violin Dias, Marcantonio Jr, Elcio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim To compare the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐2) in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier (ACS) with autogenous bone graft for augmentation of the edentulous atrophic anterior maxilla. Methods Twenty‐four subjects were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, parallel‐group, open‐label clinical trial. Subjects either received rhBMP‐2/ACS (1.5 mg/ml) or particulated autogenous bone harvested from the mandibular retromolar region. A titanium‐mesh was used to provide space and wound stability. A guide was used to standardize clinical recordings using an analogue caliper. Alveolar ridge width was also assessed using cone‐beam computed tomography. Results rhBMP‐2/ACS yielded significantly greater radiographic horizontal bone gain compared with autogenous bone graft at immediate subcrestal levels (1.5 ± 0.7 versus 0.5 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.01); non‐significant differences were observed at mid‐ (2.9 ± 0.8 versus 2.9 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.98) and apical (1.7 ± 0.9 versus 1.8 ± 1.1 mm; p = 0.85) crestal levels. No significant differences in clinical horizontal bone gain were observed at 6 months between rhBMP‐2/ACS and autogenous bone graft (3.2 ± 0.9 mm versus 3.7 ± 1.4 mm; p = 0.31). Sixty‐two implants were placed after 6 month of healing with no significant differences between groups for number of implants, implant size, primary stability and survival. Conclusions rhBMP‐2/ACS appears a realistic alternative for augmentation of the edentulous atrophic anterior maxilla. View the pubcast on this paper at http://www.scivee.tv/journalnode/60739
Bibliography:istex:93B8437DF9B0666D9A58569F214B1EC74C453FA3
ArticleID:JCPE12148
Nobel Biocare AB
ark:/67375/WNG-TWX8H5K2-W
São Paulo Research Foundation - No. 2009/16016-8
3M Non-Tenured Faculty
Conflict of interest and source of funding statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest for this study. Research funding was provided from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – grant number 2009/16016‐8), São Paulo, Brazil and CAPES, Brasilia, Brazil. Dr. Susin was supported in part by a 3M Non‐Tenured Faculty Grant, St Paul, MN, USA. Drs Wikesjö and Susin were supported in part by a grant from Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12148