Horizontal ridge augmentation of the atrophic anterior maxilla using rhBMP-2/ACS or autogenous bone grafts: a proof-of-concept randomized clinical trial
Aim To compare the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐2) in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier (ACS) with autogenous bone graft for augmentation of the edentulous atrophic anterior maxilla. Methods Twenty‐four subjects were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, parall...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical periodontology Vol. 40; no. 10; pp. 968 - 975 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.10.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aim
To compare the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐2) in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier (ACS) with autogenous bone graft for augmentation of the edentulous atrophic anterior maxilla.
Methods
Twenty‐four subjects were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, parallel‐group, open‐label clinical trial. Subjects either received rhBMP‐2/ACS (1.5 mg/ml) or particulated autogenous bone harvested from the mandibular retromolar region. A titanium‐mesh was used to provide space and wound stability. A guide was used to standardize clinical recordings using an analogue caliper. Alveolar ridge width was also assessed using cone‐beam computed tomography.
Results
rhBMP‐2/ACS yielded significantly greater radiographic horizontal bone gain compared with autogenous bone graft at immediate subcrestal levels (1.5 ± 0.7 versus 0.5 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.01); non‐significant differences were observed at mid‐ (2.9 ± 0.8 versus 2.9 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.98) and apical (1.7 ± 0.9 versus 1.8 ± 1.1 mm; p = 0.85) crestal levels. No significant differences in clinical horizontal bone gain were observed at 6 months between rhBMP‐2/ACS and autogenous bone graft (3.2 ± 0.9 mm versus 3.7 ± 1.4 mm; p = 0.31). Sixty‐two implants were placed after 6 month of healing with no significant differences between groups for number of implants, implant size, primary stability and survival.
Conclusions
rhBMP‐2/ACS appears a realistic alternative for augmentation of the edentulous atrophic anterior maxilla.
View the pubcast on this paper at http://www.scivee.tv/journalnode/60739 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:93B8437DF9B0666D9A58569F214B1EC74C453FA3 ArticleID:JCPE12148 Nobel Biocare AB ark:/67375/WNG-TWX8H5K2-W São Paulo Research Foundation - No. 2009/16016-8 3M Non-Tenured Faculty Conflict of interest and source of funding statement The authors declare no conflict of interest for this study. Research funding was provided from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP – grant number 2009/16016‐8), São Paulo, Brazil and CAPES, Brasilia, Brazil. Dr. Susin was supported in part by a 3M Non‐Tenured Faculty Grant, St Paul, MN, USA. Drs Wikesjö and Susin were supported in part by a grant from Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden. SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0303-6979 1600-051X 1600-051X |
DOI: | 10.1111/jcpe.12148 |