Comprehensive microbiological findings in peri-implantitis and periodontitis
Aim The microbial differences between peri‐implantitis and periodontitis in the same subjects were examined using 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis and real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Materials and methods Subgingival plaque samples were taken from the deepest pockets of peri‐implantitis and...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical periodontology Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 218 - 226 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aim
The microbial differences between peri‐implantitis and periodontitis in the same subjects were examined using 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis and real‐time polymerase chain reaction.
Materials and methods
Subgingival plaque samples were taken from the deepest pockets of peri‐implantitis and periodontitis sites in six subjects. The prevalence of bacteria was analysed using a 16S rRNA gene clone library and real‐time polymerase chain reaction.
Results
A total of 333 different taxa were identified from 799 sequenced clones; 231 (69%) were uncultivated phylotypes, of which 75 were novel. The numbers of bacterial taxa identified at the sites of peri‐implantitis and periodontitis were 192 and 148 respectively. The microbial composition of peri‐implantitis was more diverse when compared with that of periodontitis. Fusobacterium spp. and Streptococcus spp. were predominant in both peri‐implantitis and periodontitis, while bacteria such as Parvimonas micra were only detected in peri‐implantitis. The prevalence of periodontopathic bacteria was not high, while quantitative evaluation revealed that, in most cases, prevalence was higher at peri‐implantitis sites than at periodontitis sites.
Conclusions
The biofilm in peri‐implantitis showed a more complex microbial composition when compared with periodontitis. Common periodontopathic bacteria showed low prevalence, and several bacteria were identified as candidate pathogens in peri‐implantitis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JCPE12047 istex:0E764B1B85394799622588732C008DE21A459DCE ark:/67375/WNG-ZV90XFQ0-D The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study. This study was supported by Grants‐in‐Aid for Young Scientists (B) (No.21792110) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo, Japan and Microbe Division/Japan Collection of Microorganisms, RIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. Conflict of interest and source of funding statement ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0303-6979 1600-051X 1600-051X |
DOI: | 10.1111/jcpe.12047 |