Performance of the CES-D and its Short Forms in Screening Suicidality and Hopelessness in the Community

A measurement scale should be short and quick to complete if it is to be practically useful. Drawing on data from a community‐based survey of 2,178 people in Hong Kong, we compared five short forms (5‐ to 10‐item) and the original version (20‐item) of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSuicide & life-threatening behavior Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 79 - 88
Main Authors Cheung, Yin Bun, Liu, Ka Yuet, Yip, Paul S.F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2007
Guilford Press
Guilford
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A measurement scale should be short and quick to complete if it is to be practically useful. Drawing on data from a community‐based survey of 2,178 people in Hong Kong, we compared five short forms (5‐ to 10‐item) and the original version (20‐item) of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression Scale (CES‐D; Radloff, 1977) in predicting suicidal attempts and suicidal thoughts. Short forms with as few as nine items performed in ways very similar to the full version; a version with only five items had a detectable difference from the full version. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in differentiating people with and without suicidal thought or attempt change almost linearly with the cut‐offs.
Bibliography:istex:18110D2741D01309B2572B8DD05A4998D773EC53
ark:/67375/WNG-38N8308K-0
ArticleID:SLTB1114
The study was funded by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0363-0234
1943-278X
DOI:10.1521/suli.2007.37.1.79