Epidemiology of classical risk factors in stroke patients in the Middle East

The Middle East (ME) is an ethnically and economically diverse region. A systematic review of all stroke studies conducted in the ME was carried out, with the aim of determining the prevalence of classic vascular risk factors (CRFs) across this region. Additionally, the prevalence of CRFs in the ME...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of neurology Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 262 - 269
Main Authors Behrouz, R., Powers, C. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2016
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Middle East (ME) is an ethnically and economically diverse region. A systematic review of all stroke studies conducted in the ME was carried out, with the aim of determining the prevalence of classic vascular risk factors (CRFs) across this region. Additionally, the prevalence of CRFs in the ME was compared to that of a US cohort. Prospective and retrospective ME stroke studies published from 1994 to 2014 were searched for that specifically reported on the prevalence of CRFs. The Z test for proportions was used to determine the significance of differences in CRF rates between the ME and non‐ME studies. A total of 21 724 stroke patients from 13 nations in the ME were included. The prevalence rates for CRFs in the ME stroke population were hypertension, 62.1%; diabetes, 33.1%; dyslipidaemia, 36.8%; ischaemic heart disease, 24.6%; smoking, 19.3%; and atrial fibrillation, 13.6%. Compared to the US cohort, ME patients had a lower prevalence of all CRFs except diabetes (P < 0.0001) and smoking (P = 0.05). Compared with stroke patients in the USA, those in the ME have a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes and smoking. Education and lifestyle modification is perhaps the most effective strategy in reducing the risk of stroke in this population.
Bibliography:istex:5EF03D4EA2C07565F1B331EE3A388F4A61C69A2B
ArticleID:ENE12742
ark:/67375/WNG-QHZXHRC0-P
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1351-5101
1468-1331
DOI:10.1111/ene.12742