Evaluation of CNV detection tools for NGS panel data in genetic diagnostics

Although germline copy-number variants (CNVs) are the genetic cause of multiple hereditary diseases, detecting them from targeted next-generation sequencing data (NGS) remains a challenge. Existing tools perform well for large CNVs but struggle with single and multi-exon alterations. The aim of this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG Vol. 28; no. 12; pp. 1645 - 1655
Main Authors Moreno-Cabrera, José Marcos, Del Valle, Jesús, Castellanos, Elisabeth, Feliubadaló, Lidia, Pineda, Marta, Brunet, Joan, Serra, Eduard, Capellà, Gabriel, Lázaro, Conxi, Gel, Bernat
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Nature Publishing Group 01.12.2020
Springer International Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Although germline copy-number variants (CNVs) are the genetic cause of multiple hereditary diseases, detecting them from targeted next-generation sequencing data (NGS) remains a challenge. Existing tools perform well for large CNVs but struggle with single and multi-exon alterations. The aim of this work is to evaluate CNV calling tools working on gene panel NGS data and their suitability as a screening step before orthogonal confirmation in genetic diagnostics strategies. Five tools (DECoN, CoNVaDING, panelcn.MOPS, ExomeDepth, and CODEX2) were tested against four genetic diagnostics datasets (two in-house and two external) for a total of 495 samples with 231 single and multi-exon validated CNVs. The evaluation was performed using the default and sensitivity-optimized parameters. Results showed that most tools were highly sensitive and specific, but the performance was dataset dependant. When evaluating them in our diagnostics scenario, DECoN and panelcn.MOPS detected all CNVs with the exception of one mosaic CNV missed by DECoN. However, DECoN outperformed panelcn.MOPS specificity achieving values greater than 0.90 when using the optimized parameters. In our in-house datasets, DECoN and panelcn.MOPS showed the highest performance for CNV screening before orthogonal confirmation. Benchmarking and optimization code is freely available at https://github.com/TranslationalBioinformaticsIGTP/CNVbenchmarkeR .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1018-4813
1476-5438
DOI:10.1038/s41431-020-0675-z