Ovarian function after the use of various hemostatic techniques during treatment for endometrioma: protocol for a randomized clinical trial

• Published in: Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 20; no. 1; p. 410
• Main Authors: Araujo, Raquel Silveira da Cunha, Maia, Sabina Bastos, Baracat, Clara Micalli Ferruzzi, Lima, Moisés Diogo, Soares, Eduardo Sérgio Sousa, Ribeiro, Helizabet Salomão Abdalla Ayroza, Ribeiro, Paulo Augusto Ayroza Galvão
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central 09.07.2019; BMC
• Subjects: Anti-Mullerian hormone; Anti-Mullerian Hormone - blood; Biomarkers - blood; Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control; Brazil; Clinical trials; Cysts; Endometrioma; Endometriosis - diagnostic imaging; Endometriosis - physiopathology; Endometriosis - surgery; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects; Humans; Infertility; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopy - adverse effects; Menstruation; Oophorectomy; Ovarian Cysts - diagnostic imaging; Ovarian Cysts - physiopathology; Ovarian Cysts - surgery; Ovarian Follicle - diagnostic imaging; Ovarian Reserve; Ovaries; Patients; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Study Protocol; Surgery; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Womens health; Brazil; United States > US; Laparoscopy; Endometrioma; Ovarian reserve; Anti-Mullerian hormone
• ISSN: 1745-6215; 1745-6215
• DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3524-z

Laparoscopic cystectomy is currently considered the gold standard for the treatment of ovarian endometrioma, resulting in an improvement in symptoms, a lower recurrence rate, and a higher pregnancy rate among infertile patients. However, this treatment is not free from risk, since it is associated with a reduction in ovarian reserve. There is still controversy in the literature regarding whether the cause of the reduction in ovarian reserve is due to damage caused by the coagulation energy during hemostasis or whether the procedure itself is the cause of the damage irrespective of the hemostatic method used. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different hemostatic methods on the ovarian function of women subjected to laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma. An open-label randomized clinical trial to be conducted at the Lauro Wanderley University Hospital between December 2017 and August 2020. Eighty-four patients will be randomly allocated to three groups according to the hemostatic technique used during laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma: bipolar coagulation; laparoscopic suture; and hemostatic matrix. Ovarian function will be assessed by serum anti-Müllerian hormone measurement and by performing an antral follicle count using ultrasound before surgery and one, three, and six months after surgery. The internal review board of the Medical Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba approved the study protocol under reference CAAE 71621717.9.0000.8069. Bearing in mind the need for more randomized clinical trials to clarify this issue, we hope to contribute with data that will determine whether there is any difference between hemostatic methods despite the rational use of bipolar energy or whether the procedure itself explains the ovarian damage irrespective of the hemostatic technique used. ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03430609 . Registered on XX.10/31/2017. ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN11469394 . Registered on XX.17/12/2017. Unique Protocol ID: U1111-1203-2508.