Brain Mapping of Behavioral Domains Using Multi-Scale Networks and Canonical Correlation Analysis

Simultaneous mapping of multiple behavioral domains into brain networks remains a major challenge. Here, we shed some light on this problem by employing a combination of machine learning, structural and functional brain networks at different spatial resolutions (also known as scales), together with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 16; p. 889725
Main Authors Fernandez-Iriondo, Izaro, Jimenez-Marin, Antonio, Sierra, Basilio, Aginako, Naiara, Bonifazi, Paolo, Cortes, Jesus M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 21.06.2022
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Simultaneous mapping of multiple behavioral domains into brain networks remains a major challenge. Here, we shed some light on this problem by employing a combination of machine learning, structural and functional brain networks at different spatial resolutions (also known as scales), together with performance scores across multiple neurobehavioral domains, including sensation, motor skills, and cognition. Provided by the Human Connectome Project, we make use of three cohorts: 640 participants for model training, 160 subjects for validation, and 200 subjects for model performance testing thus enhancing prediction generalization. Our modeling consists of two main stages, namely dimensionality reduction in brain network features at multiple scales, followed by canonical correlation analysis, which determines an optimal linear combination of connectivity features to predict multiple behavioral performance scores. To assess the differences in the predictive power of each modality, we separately applied three different strategies: structural unimodal, functional unimodal, and multimodal, that is, structural in combination with functional features of the brain network. Our results show that the multimodal association outperforms any of the unimodal analyses. Then, to answer which human brain structures were most involved in predicting multiple behavioral scores, we simulated different synthetic scenarios in which in each case we completely deleted a brain structure or a complete resting state network, and recalculated performance in its absence. In deletions, we found critical structures to affect performance when predicting single behavioral domains, but this occurred in a lesser manner for prediction of multi-domain behavior. Overall, our results confirm that although there are synergistic contributions between brain structure and function that enhance behavioral prediction, brain networks may also be mutually redundant in predicting multidomain behavior, such that even after deletion of a structure, the connectivity of the others can compensate for its lack in predicting behavior.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID: Izaro Fernandez-Iriondo orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-7780
Antonio Jimenez-Marin orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-6101
Basilio Sierra orcid.org/0000-0001-8062-9332
This article was submitted to Brain Imaging Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Edited by: Jorge Sepulcre, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
Paolo Bonifazi orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-8997
Jesus M. Cortes orcid.org/0000-0002-9059-8194
Reviewed by: Elisenda Bueichekú, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States; Silvia Basaia, San Raffaele Hospital (IRCCS), Italy
Naiara Aginako orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-8215
ISSN:1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2022.889725