A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability
Several food safety issues have prompted questions regarding the role of country-of-origin labeling, traceability, and food safety inspections in consumers’ perceptions of food safety and quality. The importance of origin-labeling and traceability have been discussed in the EU for some time. North A...
Saved in:
Published in | Food policy Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 496 - 514 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.08.2007
Elsevier |
Series | Food Policy |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Several food safety issues have prompted questions regarding the role of country-of-origin labeling, traceability, and food safety inspections in consumers’ perceptions of food safety and quality. The importance of origin-labeling and traceability have been discussed in the EU for some time. North American cases of mad cow disease have led to increased discussions of these topics in the US, however, relatively little research has been conducted to examine the value US consumers place on these attributes. Choice experiments were used to analyze US consumers’ relative preferences and willingness-to-pay for these meat attributes in labeled ribeye beef steaks. Relatively speaking, consumers value certification of USDA food safety inspection more than any of the other choice set attributes, including country-of-origin labeling, traceability and tenderness. As a result, indication of origin may only become a signal of enhanced quality if the source-of-origin is associated with higher food safety or quality. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.006 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0306-9192 1873-5657 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.006 |