A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability

Several food safety issues have prompted questions regarding the role of country-of-origin labeling, traceability, and food safety inspections in consumers’ perceptions of food safety and quality. The importance of origin-labeling and traceability have been discussed in the EU for some time. North A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood policy Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 496 - 514
Main Authors Loureiro, Maria L., Umberger, Wendy J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2007
Elsevier
SeriesFood Policy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several food safety issues have prompted questions regarding the role of country-of-origin labeling, traceability, and food safety inspections in consumers’ perceptions of food safety and quality. The importance of origin-labeling and traceability have been discussed in the EU for some time. North American cases of mad cow disease have led to increased discussions of these topics in the US, however, relatively little research has been conducted to examine the value US consumers place on these attributes. Choice experiments were used to analyze US consumers’ relative preferences and willingness-to-pay for these meat attributes in labeled ribeye beef steaks. Relatively speaking, consumers value certification of USDA food safety inspection more than any of the other choice set attributes, including country-of-origin labeling, traceability and tenderness. As a result, indication of origin may only become a signal of enhanced quality if the source-of-origin is associated with higher food safety or quality.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.006
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0306-9192
1873-5657
DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.006