The Role of Magnetic Field Orientation in Vegetable Oil Premixed Combustion

• Published in: Journal of combustion Vol. 2020; no. 2020; pp. 1 - 11
• Main Authors: Wardana, I. N. G., Hamidi, Nurkholis, Yuliati, Lilis, Perdana, Dony
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2020; Hindawi; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Hindawi Limited
• Subjects: Carbon dioxide; Combustion; Consumption; Diamagnetism; Diesel engines; Diesel fuels; Efficiency; Electron spin; Emissions; Energy; Engines; Equivalence ratio; Flame speed; Flame stability; Flames; Hydrocarbons; Hydrogen; Magnetic fields; Magnetic poles; North Pole; Nuclear energy; Reaction products; Researchers; South Pole; Studies; Vegetable oils; Viscosity
• ISSN: 2090-1968; 2090-1976
• DOI: 10.1155/2020/2145353

This study observed the influence of magnetic field orientation on the premixed combustion of vegetable oil. The results show that the magnetic field increased the laminar burning velocity because the spin of electron became more energetic and changes the spin of hydrogen proton from para to ortho. The increase of flame speed became larger on vegetable oil with stronger electric poles. The attraction magnetic field gives the strongest effect against the increase of flame speed and makes flame stability limit wider toward lean equivalence ratio. This is because O2 with the paramagnetic nature is pumped more crossing flame from the south pole (S) to north pole (N) whereas the heat energy carried by H2O from the reaction product with the diamagnetic nature is pumped more crossing flame in the N pole to the S pole. This made the combustion close to Lewis number equal to unity, whereas in the repulsion magnetic poles, S-S, more O2 is pumped into the flame while more heat is pumped out of the flame, and thus, combustion in the flame is leaner and reactions are not optimal. Conversely, at N-N poles, more heat carried by H2O was pumped into the flame while more O2 was pumped out of the flame. As a result, combustion in the flame is richer and the reaction is also not optimal. As a consequence, the velocity of the laminar flame at the repelling poles is lower than that of attracting poles.