A comparison of maxillary sinus diameters in Chinese and Yemeni patients with skeletal malocclusion

• Published in: BMC oral health Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 582
• Main Authors: Albarakani, Abduljabbar Yahya, Zheng, Bo-Wen, Hong, Jialin, Al-Somairi, Majedh Abdo Ali, Abdulqader, Abass Ahmed, Liu, Yi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 09.12.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Cephalometric radiograph; Cephalometry - methods; Comparative analysis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dental occlusion; Diagnosis; East Asian People; Ethnicity; Female; Gender; Humans; Male; Malocclusion; Malocclusion, Angle Class III - diagnostic imaging; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging; Maxillary sinus; Maxillary Sinus - diagnostic imaging; Minority & ethnic groups; Orthodontics; Sinuses; Skeletal malocclusion; Statistical analysis; Surface area; China; Yemen; Skeletal malocclusion; Cephalometric radiograph; Ethnicity; Gender; Maxillary sinus
• ISSN: 1472-6831; 1472-6831
• DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02633-0

This study aimed to compare the maxillary sinus dimensions and surface area in accordance with skeletal malocclusion, gender and ethnicity factors in a sample of Chinese and Yemeni patients. This cross-sectional study analysed 180 maxillary sinuses using 180 lateral cephalometric radiographs. The patients were subdivided into two ethnic groups: Chinese and Yemeni. Each ethnic group comprised 90 patients, and men and women were divided equally. Each ethnic group was classified into three skeletal classes using ANB and Wits appraisal (skeletal Classes I, II and III). Pearson's correlation coefficient was also used to assess the relationship between maxillary sinus dimensions and cephalometric parameters. Men had larger maxillary sinuses than women; skeletal Class II had a higher length and surface area increase than other skeletal classes, although skeletal Classes I and II were almost equal in height. Except for the maxillary sinus length, none of these findings were statistically significant. The maxillary sinuses in Chinese are larger than those in Yemenis (P = 0.000). These variables were positively correlated with SNA, SNB and Co-A. The maxillary sinus length and Co-Gn were positively correlated. The NA-APO and NA-FH angles were also correlated with the maxillary sinus surface area. However, the gonial and GoGn-Sn angles negatively affected the maxillary sinus dimension and surface area. Men had larger maxillary sinuses than women in both ethnic groups, and Chinese individuals had larger maxillary sinuses than Yemenis. Skeletal Class II malocclusion of both ethnicities had larger maxillary sinus dimensions. Furthermore, the maxillary sinus dimensions correlated with cephalometric parameters.