Comparison of Nanofiltration with Reverse Osmosis in Reclaiming Tertiary Treated Municipal Wastewater for Irrigation Purposes

• Published in: Membranes (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 32
• Main Authors: Hafiz, MhdAmmar, Hawari, Alaa H, Alfahel, Radwan, Hassan, Mohammad K, Altaee, Ali
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 02.01.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: Calcium; Calcium chloride; Effluents; Energy consumption; Energy recovery; Flow velocity; Food; Food processing; Irrigation; Irrigation water; Molecular weight; Municipal wastewater; Nanofiltration; Nanotechnology; Nitrates; Osmosis; Pressure; Reclamation; Reverse osmosis; Sodium; Technology assessment; treated sewage effluent; Wastewater; Wastewater irrigation; Wastewater renovation; Wastewater treatment; Water quality; Water quality standards; Water reclamation; water reuse; Water treatment; United States > US; reverse osmosis; water reuse; treated sewage effluent; nanofiltration; irrigation water
• ISSN: 2077-0375; 2077-0375
• DOI: 10.3390/membranes11010032

This study compares the performance of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) for the reclamation of ultrafiltered municipal wastewater for irrigation of food crops. RO and NF technologies were evaluated at different applied pressures; the performance of each technology was evaluated in terms of water flux, recovery rate, specific energy consumption and quality of permeate. It was found that the permeate from the reverse osmosis (RO) process complied with Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) standards at pressures applied between 10 and 18 bar. At an applied pressure of 20 bar, the permeate quality did not comply with irrigation water standards in terms of chloride, sodium and calcium concentration. It was found that nanofiltration process was not suitable for the reclamation of wastewater as the concentration of chloride, sodium and calcium exceeded the allowable limits at all applied pressures. In the reverse osmosis process, the highest recovery rate was 36%, which was achieved at a pressure of 16 bar. The specific energy consumption at this applied pressure was 0.56 kWh/m . The lowest specific energy of 0.46 kWh/m was achieved at an applied pressure of 12 bar with a water recovery rate of 32.7%.