Comparison between two different pretreatment technologies of rice straw fibers prior to fiberboard manufacturing: Twin-screw extrusion and digestion plus defibration

• Published in: Industrial crops and products Vol. 107; pp. 184 - 197
• Main Authors: Theng, Dyna, Arbat, Gerard, Delgado-Aguilar, Marc, Ngo, Bunthan, Labonne, Laurent, Evon, Philippe, Mutjé, Pere
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15.11.2017; Elsevier
• Subjects: Defibration; Digestion; Energy consumption; Life Sciences; Rice straw; Twin-screw extrusion; Defibration; Energy consumption; Digestion; Twin-screw extrusion; Rice straw; rice straw; panneau de fibres; defibration; extrusion; twin-screw extrusion; digestion; paille de riz; energy consumption; processus de fabrication
• ISSN: 0926-6690; 1872-633X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.049

•Thermo-mechanical pretreatment of rice straw fibers was investigated.•Two technologies were used: twin-screw extrusion, and digestion plus defibration.•L/S ratios used for both technologies had an influence on the energy consumption.•Twin-screw extrusion consumed energy less than that of digestion plus defibration.•A large amount of water-solubles were removed using digestion plus defibration. The present work compares two different pretreatment technologies, i.e. twin-screw extrusion, and steaming digestion plus defibration, for producing a thermo-mechanical pulp from rice straw for fiberboard manufacturing. Five liquid/solid ratios from 0.43 to 1.02 were tested for twin-screw extrusion pretreatment, while liquid/solid ratios from 4 to 6 were used for digestion pretreatment. Energy consumption, and characteristics of the extrudates (twin-screw extrusion) and pulps (digestion) (including fiber morphology, chemical composition, thermal properties, apparent and tapped densities, as well as color) were the analyzed parameters for the resulting lignocellulosic fibers. The results showed that liquid/solid ratio had influence on energy consumption of the equipment for both defibrating methods For the twin-screw extrusion method, a lower liquid/solid ratio required more energy while for the digestion plus defibration the effect was the opposite. The corresponding total specific energy consumption ranged from 0.668kWh/kg to 0.946kWh/kg dry matter for twin-screw extrusion, and from 6.176kWh/kg to 8.52kWh/kg dry matter for digestion plus defibration. Thus, the pulping method consumed about nine times more energy than that of the twin-screw extrusion. In addition, for twin-screw extrusion, the liquid/solid ratio did not have a substantial effect on fiber characteristics with similar chemical compositions and thermal properties. For twin-screw extrusion, the energy consumption was 37% reduced when the liquid/solid ratio was increased from 0.43 to 1.02. Instead, for digestion plus defibration, the energy increase was 38% when the liquid/solid ratio increased from 4 to 6.