Preservation versus nonpreservation of the left colic artery in anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

• Published in: BMC surgery Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 164
• Main Authors: Zheng, Huichao, Li, Fan, Xie, Xingjie, Zhao, Song, Huang, Bin, Tong, Weidong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 10.05.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Abdomen; Analysis; Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic leakage; Anterior resection; Body mass index; Cancer; Cancer therapies; Classification; Colic; Colorectal cancer; Complications; Dissection; Hospitals; Inferior mesenteric artery; Laparoscopy; Left colic artery; Lymph nodes; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Ostomy; Patients; Preservation; Rectal cancer; Rectum; Robotics; Spleen; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Survival; Survival analysis; Tomography; Tumors; Variables; Veins & arteries; Anastomotic leakage; Anterior resection; Rectal cancer; Surgery; Inferior mesenteric artery; Left colic artery
• ISSN: 1471-2482; 1471-2482
• DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01614-y

Preserving the left colic artery (LCA) during anterior resection for rectal cancer is controversial, and robust evidence of the outcomes of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery on anastomotic leakage and number of harvested lymph nodes. Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer between September 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: preservation of LCA and nonpreservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were number of harvested lymph nodes, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival. A total of 216 patients were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 60 patients in each group. Anastomotic leakage in the LCA preservation group was significantly lower than that in the LCA nonpreservation group (3.3% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, operation time, intraoperative complications, splenic flexure mobilization, total number of harvested lymph nodes, number of positive lymph nodes, time to first flatus, or postoperative hospital stay. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 3-year disease-free survival of 85.7% vs. 80.5% (P = 0.738) and overall survival of 92.4% vs. 93.7% (P = 0.323) for the preservation and nonpreservation groups, respectively. LCA preservation plus apical lymph node dissection surgery for rectal cancer may help reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without impairing the number of harvested lymph nodes. Preliminary results suggest that 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates may not differ between the two types of surgery, but studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these conclusions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03776370. Registered 14 December 2018-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov .