Efficacy of twice-daily high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on associative memory

• Published in: Frontiers in human neuroscience Vol. 16; p. 973298
• Main Authors: Hua, Qiang, Zhang, Yuanyuan, Li, Qianqian, Gao, Xiaoran, Du, Rongrong, Wang, Yingru, Zhou, Qian, Zhang, Ting, Sun, Jinmei, Zhang, Lei, Ji, Gong-Jun, Wang, Kai
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 12.10.2022; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: associative memory; Brain research; hippocampal-cortical network; inferior parietal lobule; Magnetic fields; Memory; Neuroscience; stimulation dose; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; United Kingdom > UK; Canada; Montreal Quebec Canada; inferior parietal lobule; stimulation dose; transcranial magnetic stimulation; associative memory; hippocampal-cortical network
• ISSN: 1662-5161; 1662-5161
• DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.973298

Several studies have examined the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on associative memory (AM) but findings were inconsistent. Here, we aimed to test whether twice-daily rTMS could significantly improve AM. In this single-blind, sham-controlled experiment, 40 participants were randomized to receive twice-daily sham or real rTMS sessions for five consecutive days (a total of 16,000 pulses). The stimulation target in left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) exhibiting peak functional connectivity to the left hippocampus was individually defined for each participant. Participants completed both a picture-cued word association task and Stroop test at baseline and 1 day after the final real or sham rTMS session. Effects of twice-daily rTMS on AM and Stroop test performance were compared using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance with main factors Group (real vs. sham) and Time (baseline vs. post-rTMS). There was a significant Group × Time interaction effect. AM score was significantly enhanced in the twice-daily real group after rTMS, but this difference could not survive the analysis after multiple comparison correction. Further, AM improvement in the twice-daily real group was not superior to a previously reported once-daily rTMS group receiving 8,000 pulses. Then, we combined the twice- and once-daily real groups, and found a significant Group × Time interaction effect. analysis indicated that the AM score was significantly enhanced in the real group after multiple comparisons correction. Our prospective experiment did not show significant rTMS effect on AM, but this effect may become significant if more participants could be recruited as revealed by our retrospective analysis.