Constructing Dynamic Brain Functional Networks via Hyper-Graph Manifold Regularization for Mild Cognitive Impairment Classification

Brain functional networks (BFNs) constructed via manifold regularization (MR) have emerged as a powerful tool in finding new biomarkers for brain disease diagnosis. However, they only describe the pair-wise relationship between two brain regions, and cannot describe the functional interaction betwee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 15; p. 669345
Main Authors Ji, Yixin, Zhang, Yutao, Shi, Haifeng, Jiao, Zhuqing, Wang, Shui-Hua, Wang, Chuang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 01.04.2021
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Brain functional networks (BFNs) constructed via manifold regularization (MR) have emerged as a powerful tool in finding new biomarkers for brain disease diagnosis. However, they only describe the pair-wise relationship between two brain regions, and cannot describe the functional interaction between multiple brain regions, or the high-order relationship, well. To solve this issue, we propose a method to construct dynamic BFNs (DBFNs) via hyper-graph MR (HMR) and employ it to classify mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects. First, we construct DBFNs via Pearson ’s correlation (PC) method and remodel the PC method as an optimization model. Then, we use k -nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm to construct the hyper-graph and obtain the hyper-graph manifold regularizer based on the hyper-graph. We introduce the hyper-graph manifold regularizer and the L 1-norm regularizer into the PC-based optimization model to optimize DBFNs and obtain the final sparse DBFNs (SDBFNs). Finally, we conduct classification experiments to classify MCI subjects from normal subjects to verify the effectiveness of our method. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves better classification performance compared with other state-of-the-art methods, and the classification accuracy (ACC), the sensitivity (SEN), the specificity (SPE), and the area under the curve (AUC) reach 82.4946 ± 0.2827%, 77.2473 ± 0.5747%, 87.7419 ± 0.2286%, and 0.9021 ± 0.0007, respectively. This method expands the MR method and DBFNs with more biological significance. It can effectively improve the classification performance of DBFNs for MCI, and has certain reference value for the research and auxiliary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Neuroprosthetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Reviewed by: Xia-an Bi, Hunan Normal University, China; Weikai Li, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China
Edited by: Mohammad Khosravi, Persian Gulf University, Iran
ISSN:1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2021.669345