The new universal definition of myocardial infarction criteria improve electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome

To assess whether revised electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria improve emergency department identification of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina (UA) and predict outcome, we studied 120 patients with a nondiagnostic initial ECG by prior criteria. Electrocardiograms were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of electrocardiology Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 69 - 73
Main Authors Fleischmann, Kirsten E., Zègre-Hemsey, Jessica, Drew, Barbara J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-0736
1532-8430
1532-8430
DOI10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.10.037

Cover

More Information
Summary:To assess whether revised electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria improve emergency department identification of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina (UA) and predict outcome, we studied 120 patients with a nondiagnostic initial ECG by prior criteria. Electrocardiograms were read in a blinded fashion months apart with standard and then revised criteria, and analyzed by χ 2 and logistic regression analysis. In 12 subjects (10%), the initial ECG was now interpreted as diagnostic of ischemia. Eleven (92%) had an MI, 1 had UA (8%), and none had a noncardiac diagnosis. Ischemic ECG changes were strongly associated with MI or UA ( P = .003). At 1-year follow-up, ECG changes diagnostic of ischemia were associated with a trend toward higher mortality (25% vs 7%, P = .07), but after adjustment for clinical factors, ECG changes were not an independent predictor of 1-year mortality. Revision of the ECG criteria for ischemia was associated with enhanced diagnostic performance and identified a subset of patients at higher risk.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-0736
1532-8430
1532-8430
DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.10.037