A Newly Developed HPLC-UV/Vis Method Using Chemical Derivatization with 2-Naphthalenethiol for Quantitation of Sulforaphane in Rat Plasma

• Published in: Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 26; no. 18; p. 5473
• Main Authors: Shin, Kyong-Oh, Park, Kyungho
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 08.09.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: 2-naphthalenethiol; Accuracy; Acetonitrile; Analytical methods; Animals; Biological properties; Biological samples; Calibration; Cancer; Carcinogens; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods; Chromophores; derivatization; Female; Flow velocity; Formic acid; High performance liquid chromatography; HPLC-UV/Vis; In vivo methods and tests; Isothiocyanate; Isothiocyanates - blood; Isothiocyanates - chemistry; Isothiocyanates - pharmacokinetics; Limit of Detection; Liquid chromatography; Metastasis; Methods; Naphthalenes - chemistry; Oral administration; Pharmacokinetics; Plasma; Quantitation; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reagents; Regression analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Sensors; Separation; Solvents; Spectrometry; Sulfhydryl Compounds - chemistry; Sulforaphane; Sulfoxides - blood; Sulfoxides - chemistry; Sulfoxides - pharmacokinetics; Ultraviolet Rays; pharmacokinetics; 2-naphthalenethiol; sulforaphane; derivatization; HPLC-UV/Vis
• ISSN: 1420-3049; 1420-3049
• DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185473

Sulforaphane (SFN), a naturally occurring isothiocyanate, has received significant attention because of its ability to modulate multiple biological functions, including anti-carcinogenic properties. However, currently available analytical methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-UV/Vis for the quantification of SFN have a number of limitations, e.g., low UV absorbance, sensitivity, or accuracy, due to the lack of a chromophore for spectrometric detection. Therefore, we here employed the analytical derivatization procedure using 2-naphthalenethiol (2-NT) to improve the detectability of SFN, followed by HPLC separation and quantification with UV/Vis detection. The optimal derivatization conditions were carried out with 0.3 M of 2-NT in acetonitrile with phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) by incubation at 37 °C for 60 min. Separation was performed in reverse phase mode using a Kinetex C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, with 0.1% formic acid as a mobile phase A, and acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid solution as a mobile phase B with a gradient elution, with a detection wavelength of 234 nm. The method was validated over a linear range of 10-2000 ng/mL with a correlation of determination (R ) > 0.999 using weighted linear regression analysis. The intra- and inter-assay accuracy (% of nominal value) and precision (% of relative standard deviation) were within ±10 and <15%, respectively. Moreover, the specificity, recovery, matrix effect, process efficiency, and short-term and long-term stabilities of this method were within acceptable limits. Finally, we applied this method for studying in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK) following oral administration of SFN at doses of 10 or 20 mg/kg. The C (μg/mL), T (hour), and AUC (μg·h/mL) of each oral dose were 0.92, 1.99, and 4.88 and 1.67, 1.00, and 9.85, respectively. Overall, the proposed analytical method proved to be reliable and applicable for quantification of SFN in biological samples.