Enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin in horses: comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters, use of urinary and metabolite data to estimate first-pass effect and absorbed fraction

Enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin are two veterinary fluoroquinolones used to treat severe bacterial infections in horses. A repeated measures study has been designed to compare their pharmacokinetic parameters, to investigate their bioavailability and to estimate their absorbed fraction and first-pass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics Vol. 29; no. 5; pp. 337 - 344
Main Authors PEYROU, M, BOUSQUET-MELOU, A, LAROUTE, V, VRINS, A, DOUCET, M.Y
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2006
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin are two veterinary fluoroquinolones used to treat severe bacterial infections in horses. A repeated measures study has been designed to compare their pharmacokinetic parameters, to investigate their bioavailability and to estimate their absorbed fraction and first-pass effect by using plasma, urinary and metabolite data collected from five healthy mares. Clearance and Vd₍ss₎ were greater for enrofloxacin (mean ± SD = 6.34 ± 1.5 mL/min/kg and 2.32 ± 0.32 L/kg, respectively) than for marbofloxacin (4.62 ± 0.67 mL/min/kg and 1.6 ± 0.25 L/kg, respectively). Variance of the AUC₀₋inf of marbofloxacin was lower than that for enrofloxacin, with, respectively, a CV = 15% and 26% intravenously and a CV = 31% and 55% after oral administration. Mean oral bioavailability was not significantly different between marbofloxacin (59%) and enrofloxacin (55%). The mean percentage of the dose eliminated unchanged in urine was significantly higher for marbofloxacin (39.7%) than that for enrofloxacin (3.4%). Absorbed fraction and first-pass effect were only determinable for enrofloxacin, whereas the percentage of the dose absorbed in the portal circulation was estimated to be 78% and the fraction not extracted during the first pass through the liver was 65%. Consequently, the moderate observed bioavailability of enrofloxacin appears to be mainly caused by hepatic first-pass effect.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00752.x
ark:/67375/WNG-SLNX5KLK-F
ArticleID:JVP752
istex:3BAAF805EBFF07959F068B1CD197A59981A8B401
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0140-7783
1365-2885
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00752.x