Study on a job competence evaluation system for resident physicians (including integrated postgraduates) receiving standardized training

• Published in: BMC medical education Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 834
• Main Authors: Fu, Yuanzheng, Zhao, Guoxiang, Shan, Jie, Zeng, Luxian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 07.11.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Clinical competence; Collaboration; Communication Skills; Competence; Competency Based Education; Continuing education; Core competencies; Developed Nations; Education reform; Educational Background; Educational Change; Educational Development; Evaluation; Family planning; Graduate Medical Education; Health care industry; Health care policy; Hospitals; Integrated Curriculum; Integrated education; Job competence; Knowledge; Labor Force; Lifelong Learning; Likert Scales; Literature Reviews; Medical education; Medical ethics; Medical Services; Opinions; Personality Traits; Physicians; Planning Commissions; Postgraduates pursuing a professional degree; Professionalism; Questionnaires; Resident physician; Residents (Medicine); Selection Criteria; Standardization; Standardized training; Teaching hospitals; Training; China; Canada; United States > US
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04833-w

Abstract Background Standardized training for resident physicians is the primary form of postgraduate medical education, and it plays a pivotal role in healthcare safety and industry stability. Currently, it has garnered significant attention from healthcare institutions. Methods By conducting a comprehensive literature review and a Delphi consultation in June 2022 for which 40 experts in clinical medicine, public health, and other related fields in China were invited. The indicators were adjusted according to the results of the consultation, and the final indicator weights were determined through an analytic hierarchy process. Results The response rate was 100%, and the expert authority coefficient was 0.879. The consistency among the experts on the tertiary indicators, as measured by Kendall’s W , was 0.675 (χ 2  = 42.516, p  < 0.001). Based on the results of the expert consultation, a job competence evaluation system for resident physicians (including integrated postgraduates) receiving standardized training was established, which included 6 primary indicators, 18 secondary indicators, and 116 tertiary indicators. The weights for the primary indicators, namely professional quality, skills and knowledge, patient care, communication and collaboration, teaching skills, and lifelong learning, were 0.313, 0.248, 0.181, 0.083, 0.066, and 0.110, respectively. The top three secondary indicators in terms of combined weights were clinical skills (0.122), professional ethics (0.120), and professional dedication (0.109). The three tertiary indicators with the highest scores were “maintains collaboration with peers and colleagues in patient treatment,” “has clinical thinking skills, makes diagnosis and treatment decisions based on analysis of evidence, and has the ability to administer suitable treatments,” and “abides by laws and discipline and refuses to seek personal gains in medical practice”; their combined weights were 0.035, 0.028, and 0.027, respectively. Conclusion This study has established a concrete, objective, and quantifiable competency assessment index system for standardized training of clinical resident physicians (including integrated postgraduates). This system provides a foundation for the quantitative evaluation of the competency of clinical resident physicians (including integrated postgraduates) undergoing standardized training.